Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...truth''' is a sentence which is [[truth|true]] by virtue of its [[logical structure]]. sentence (i) is necessarily true due to the meaning of the [[logical constant]]s ''every, or'', independently of the words ''raven'' and ''black
    747 bytes (107 words) - 19:44, 17 February 2009
  • ...]] by means of [[transformation]]s, and [[Logical Form]] is derived from S-structure in a similar way. See [[affect alpha]].
    662 bytes (84 words) - 19:48, 29 August 2014
  • ...ch syntactic level of representation ([[D-structure]], [[S-structure]], [[Logical Form]]). The Projection Principle entails that sentence (i) cannot have the structure in (ii).
    1 KB (174 words) - 12:56, 20 February 2009
  • ...[[adjunct]] in a [[passive]] construction headed by by and containing the logical subject. In (i) the ''by''-phrase contains ''Vitesse'', the logical subject of ''won'' (cf. ''Vitesse won the match''). As shown by (ii), ''by'
    1 KB (152 words) - 13:33, 31 March 2008
  • ...he [[logical object]] shows up as the [[grammatical subject]], while the [[logical subject]] is not expressed at all or shows up in an adjunct [[by-phrase]]. ...is in fact the sum of a cluster of properties (logical object as subject, logical subject as optional adjunct, passive morphology on the verb, no Case assign
    4 KB (558 words) - 16:50, 19 February 2009
  • ...the grammatical form of a sentence is often misleading with respect to its logical properties, for example in the case of [[definite description]]s. ...uage) and its logical form (in the semantic sense). LF is derived from [[S-structure]] through instances of [[affect alpha]], e.g. [[Quantifier Raising]] and ''
    2 KB (326 words) - 18:51, 12 July 2014
  • ...one would like to propose for semantic reasons does not correspond to the structure one would like to propose for phonological reasons. ...'not more happy' with reversed [[scope]]. Hence the semantically motivated structure is ''[[un happy] er]''.
    4 KB (495 words) - 05:59, 29 March 2008
  • ...ss-the-board''' (ATB) if they may affect all [[conjunct]]s in a coordinate structure at the same time. Williams, E. 1978. Discourse and Logical Form. ''Linguistic Inquiry 8-1'', 101-139.
    756 bytes (112 words) - 13:45, 17 January 2008
  • ...ology to Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), ''The Structure of Phonological Representations (I),'' 131-175. ...ences of Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), ''The Structure of Phonological Representations (I),'' 131-175.
    1 KB (155 words) - 15:32, 28 April 2008
  • ...e an autonomous level of representation related to deep structure, surface structure and/or LF. See [[meaning theories]].
    1 KB (192 words) - 18:28, 28 October 2014
  • ...at characterizes a [[mass noun]] like ''water'' in terms of the cumulative structure of its [[extension]]. *Link, G. 1983. The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: a lattice-theoretical approach. In ''Me
    934 bytes (137 words) - 16:12, 22 May 2008
  • *J. Bayer, Directionality and Logical Form: on the Scope of Focusing Particles and Wh-in-situ. Dordrecht 1996. *S. Berman, On the Semantics and Logical Form of WH-Clauses. Diss. MIT Cambridge , Mass. 1991.
    6 KB (856 words) - 06:57, 17 October 2007
  • ...account for this [[ambiguity]], Williams & Di Sciullo assign a co-analyzed structure to the [[NP]] ''the man's'', cf. (iv): *Williams, E. 1979. Discourse and Logical Form. ''Linguistic Inquiry 8-1,'' 101-139.
    2 KB (235 words) - 10:15, 29 April 2008
  • * Hoeksema, J. 1987. ''Relating Word Structure and Logical Form,'' [[Linguistic Inquiry]] 18, pp. 119-126 * May, Robert 1985. ''Logical form,'' MIT Press
    2 KB (348 words) - 08:01, 28 September 2014
  • This structure is ruled out, because there are two [[barrier]]s between ''who'' and its tr * May, Robert 1985. ''Logical form,'' MIT Press
    2 KB (268 words) - 10:46, 31 August 2014
  • ...lent in the [[Principles and Parameters framework]], which has the general structure in (i): ...et the demands of [[Case]] theory, and possibly [[Binding Theory]]. LF ( [[Logical Form]]) is derived from SS through the application of affect alpha (e.g [[Q
    2 KB (303 words) - 07:06, 17 August 2014
  • ...ology to Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), ''The Structure of Phonological Representations (I),'' 131-175. ...ences of Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), ''The Structure of Phonological Representations (I),'' 131-175.
    3 KB (438 words) - 15:04, 28 April 2008
  • ...correspondence theory of meaning). The denotational theory is typical of [[logical semantics]] which is [[truth condition]]al and [[model]]-theoretic (Montagu ...eory: [[Katz-Fodor-semantics]], [[Generative Semantics]], and [[Conceptual Structure]] (Jackendoff 1983).
    3 KB (358 words) - 18:19, 17 February 2009
  • * Chomsky, N. 1955. ''The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory,'' University of Chicago Press, Chicago(1975). ...logy to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological Representations (I), pp.131-175
    3 KB (418 words) - 21:53, 8 February 2021
  • ...come into play in extra-linguistic activity. But there is one node at the logical top of the functional web, the cardinal node, the lemma node. For most, if ...he different concepts which the lexeme can represent. So this part of the structure, as you can see, is purely ''relational''.
    4 KB (712 words) - 06:35, 8 October 2017
  • ...980) [[Accessibility]] Condition, Safir's (1984) PCOB, Reinhart's (1983) S-Structure c-command requirement. Best-known among these is Koopman & Sportiche's * May, Robert 1985. ''Logical form,'' MIT Press
    2 KB (356 words) - 02:48, 6 August 2021
  • *[[Chomsky, N.]] ''The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory.'' Cambridge, Mass. 1955; N. Y. 1975.
    4 KB (530 words) - 13:57, 2 July 2007
  • '''Dominance''' is a dominance is a binary relation between nodes in a [[tree structure]] which can be defined as follows: The Dominance relation has the following logical properties:
    4 KB (660 words) - 16:20, 3 August 2014
  • ...between clauses and clause complexes, which are independent of grammatical structure.<br /> ...semantic relations established between propositions making up the thematic structure.
    16 KB (2,344 words) - 11:49, 20 May 2013
  • [[Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar]] [[Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar]]
    11 KB (1,347 words) - 16:57, 21 May 2013
  • ...evel of linguistic analysis – lexicon, phonology, morphology, syntax, text structure, semantics, pragmatics, dialectology, language change, psycho- and sociolin ...m, which has prevailed until our days. The aspects of systems which exceed structure, viz. functions, dynamics, processes, were disregarded almost completely. T
    9 KB (1,442 words) - 10:11, 14 June 2014
  • ...ion and whose grammar is - in most cases - applied to the overall sentence structure. The embedded language is the one from which switches may originate. Some m ...code-switching was considered something that occurred randomly, without a logical pattern behind it, as a result of imperfect second language learning.
    10 KB (1,391 words) - 15:32, 31 January 2010
  • ...tive Semantics]] -- [[Intensional logic]] -- [[Katz-Fodor-semantics]] -- [[Logical semantics]] -- [[Model (semantics)|Model]] -- [[Model theory]] -- [[Montagu [[Componential analysis]] -- [[Conceptual Structure]] -- [[Semantic feature]] -- [[Sense relation]]<br>
    8 KB (928 words) - 09:11, 20 May 2010
  • .... This means that he infers from the context of situation which linguistic structure and patterns are likely or unlikely to be used in a text. Field, mode and t ...of the semantic system of a language [are] (a) ideational, subdivided into logical and experiential; (b) interpersonal; and (c) textual. [...] the field is re
    16 KB (2,262 words) - 16:59, 22 May 2013
  • 1967c. Ronri-gaku-jo no shugo. [On the subject in the logical sense.] Koroba no Uchu December. 87-96. ...mal linear grammars": and Peter S. Landweber; "Decision problems of phrase-structure grammars". The Journal of Symbolic Logic 32. 114-115.
    18 KB (2,647 words) - 12:19, 11 July 2021
  • *1968c. Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure. CLS 4.71-80. Reprinted in McCawley 1973e:155-66. German translation in S. *1973i. Syntactic and logical arguments for semantic structures. In O. Fujimura (ed.), Three dimensions o
    31 KB (4,322 words) - 06:06, 8 March 2009
  • ...le to say that “[w]here there is ellipsis, there is presupposition, in the structure, that something is to be supplied, or ‘understood’” (HALLIDAY & HASAN ...a text/discourse in a precise way and bring the presented elements into a logical order. Over all, there exist three different kinds of conjunctive [adjuncts
    22 KB (3,425 words) - 17:49, 26 June 2010