Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Page title matches

  • '''Role and Reference Grammar (RRG)''' is a [[syntactic framework]] that was developed around 1980 by [[R ...s.buffalo.edu/people/faculty/vanvalin/rrg.html Official Role and Reference Grammar website]
    1 KB (170 words) - 20:52, 25 July 2014

Page text matches

  • In [[Functional Grammar]], a '''predicative adjunct''' is a [[secondary predicate]] (e.g. Hengeveld ==Reference==
    333 bytes (36 words) - 19:04, 27 September 2014
  • ...onal Discourse Grammar has gradually come to replace the use of Functional Grammar, although the two coexist quite happily. ...ectural reconception draws particular attention to the interaction between Grammar and surrounding systems.
    2 KB (240 words) - 15:52, 2 March 2009
  • In Quirk et al.'s (1985) influential grammar of English, a '''predeterminer''' is an element preceding the [[determiner] ===Reference===
    450 bytes (56 words) - 19:13, 20 July 2014
  • In more recent versions of [[Role and Reference Grammar]], a '''core argument''' is simply an [[argument]] of the clause, i.e. an e In earlier versions of Role and Reference Grammar, there was also a notion of [[peripheral argument]] (Foley & Van Valin 1984
    1,005 bytes (137 words) - 07:13, 12 September 2007
  • In [[Functional Grammar]] (e.g. Dik 1989), the term '''semantic function''' is used for [[semantic === Reference ===
    423 bytes (49 words) - 19:46, 26 June 2007
  • ...and Reference Grammar]], [[Systemic Functional Grammar]] and [[Functional Grammar]] are among its chief representatives. :::*''"RRG may be labelled a "structural-functionalist theory of grammar"; this is intended to situate it on a continuum of perspectives ranging fro
    2 KB (216 words) - 15:05, 22 January 2009
  • ...rect core argument]] (used in more recent versions of [[Role and Reference Grammar]]) In more recent versions of [[Role and Reference Grammar]] (Van Valin & LaPolla 1997), ''core argument'' refers just to an [[argumen
    1 KB (203 words) - 07:12, 12 September 2007
  • ===Reference=== [[Huddleston, Rodney]] & [[Pullum, Geoffrey K.]] (eds.) 2002. ''The Cambridge grammar of the English language.'' Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    480 bytes (62 words) - 12:16, 22 December 2008
  • '''Core-grammar''' is that part of the relatively stable (steady) state of the language fac [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Core-grammar&lemmacode=940 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    559 bytes (77 words) - 08:05, 21 May 2008
  • In the [[generative grammar]] of the 1960s, the term '''pronominalization''' referred to a [[transforma ===Reference===
    516 bytes (66 words) - 17:32, 30 January 2009
  • ===Reference=== *Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1967. ''Intonation and grammar in British English.'' The Hague: Mouton.
    601 bytes (75 words) - 19:12, 8 September 2007
  • ===Reference=== *Göksel, Asli & Kerslake, Celia. 2005. ''Turkish: A comprehensive grammar.'' London: Routledge.
    514 bytes (65 words) - 16:39, 30 August 2007
  • ...ject]], especially of a nonfinite verb such as an [[infinitive]], gets its reference. In earlier transformational grammar, the term [[equi-NP deletion]] was often used for such constructions, but i
    983 bytes (126 words) - 10:31, 20 June 2007
  • Rehg, Kenneth. 1981. ''Ponapean reference grammar.'' Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
    131 bytes (14 words) - 11:58, 20 May 2013
  • ===Reference=== *Nichols, Johanna. 1986. "Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar." ''Language'' 62:56-119.
    714 bytes (73 words) - 12:23, 10 February 2009
  • ...afe to say that the nature of syntactic categories is at the very heart of grammar."'' (Croft 1991:36) The term apparently originates in generative grammar of the 1960s, although it is also used by non-generativists such as Croft (
    1 KB (162 words) - 14:56, 19 September 2007
  • ...g (see [[componential analysis]]). They are extensively used in [[Montague Grammar]]. ===Reference===
    883 bytes (125 words) - 16:26, 6 October 2007
  • === Reference=== [[Category:Grammar]]
    889 bytes (123 words) - 14:38, 2 July 2007
  • In Latin grammar, the principal parts of verbs are often taken to be the first person singul ===Reference===
    822 bytes (104 words) - 09:16, 22 January 2008
  • '''RRG''' is a common abbreviation for [[Role and Reference Grammar]].
    104 bytes (13 words) - 07:10, 12 September 2007
  • *[[semantic function]] (Simon Dik's Functional Grammar) === Reference ===
    1 KB (145 words) - 21:15, 30 June 2007
  • # Pidgin-Creoles: Nongrammar --> Grammar ===Reference===
    1 KB (161 words) - 07:20, 25 January 2008
  • ===Reference=== *Göksel, Asli & Kerslake, Celia. 2005. ''Turkish: A comprehensive grammar.'' London: Routledge.
    805 bytes (114 words) - 15:07, 29 August 2007
  • '''Role and Reference Grammar (RRG)''' is a [[syntactic framework]] that was developed around 1980 by [[R ...s.buffalo.edu/people/faculty/vanvalin/rrg.html Official Role and Reference Grammar website]
    1 KB (170 words) - 20:52, 25 July 2014
  • ...and reference. In a strictly [[compositional semantics]] (e.g. [[Montague Grammar]]), there will be a interpretive rule for every syntactic rule. * Chomsky, N. 1972. ''Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar,'' Mouton, The Hague.
    739 bytes (101 words) - 17:23, 15 February 2009
  • ===Reference=== *Lefebvre, Claire. 1998. ''Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar: The case of Haitian Creole.'' Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    926 bytes (120 words) - 08:55, 17 September 2007
  • ===Reference=== *[[Smith, Carlota S.]] 1964. Determiners and relative clauses in a generative grammar of English. ''Language'' 40:37-52.
    1,018 bytes (107 words) - 00:12, 10 August 2007
  • ...classification of Kloss (1969): It refers to modifications in vocabulary, grammar, or writing, and it contrasts with [[status planning]]. ===Reference===
    648 bytes (88 words) - 16:57, 30 January 2013
  • ...uity of a language "entails systematic correspondences in all parts of the grammar because that is what results from normal transmission: what is transferred ===Reference===
    1 KB (177 words) - 17:09, 29 October 2007
  • ...case (or gets [[null case]]). PRO's meaning is determined by [[control (of reference)|control]]. *Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido. 1994. ''PRO-Legomena: Distribution and reference of infinitival subjects.'' Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    791 bytes (108 words) - 10:15, 31 October 2007
  • Wackernagel's major work is the ''Altindische Grammatik'', a comprehensive grammar of the Sanskrit language. He is best known among modern linguists and philo ===Reference===
    1 KB (156 words) - 10:46, 30 October 2007
  • In [[Role and Reference Grammar]], the '''semantic macroroles''' are the two generalized semantic roles [[a ===Reference===
    881 bytes (119 words) - 12:41, 26 July 2014
  • '''Antecedent''' refers to a element which determines the reference of another element. *[[Reference]]
    568 bytes (74 words) - 08:46, 6 June 2014
  • ...substantial cognate vocabulary, and significant cognate paradigmaticity in grammar. The time depth aimed at is over 5000 years (Indo-European is some 6000 yea ===Reference===
    1 KB (159 words) - 14:47, 19 September 2007
  • ...ectly expressed in its [[surface structure]]. Otherwise the language is '''reference-dominated''' (Foley & Van Valin 1980, 1984). ...le-dominated language is Archi (Nakh-Daghestanian). A typical example of a reference-dominated language is English.
    742 bytes (96 words) - 20:51, 25 July 2014
  • *1948. ''Descriptive Italian grammar.'' Cornell University Press. ===Reference===
    1 KB (155 words) - 15:22, 10 September 2007
  • ...h its meanings diverges considerably. It is a technical term in Relational Grammar, and it may well be that it spread to linguistics from there. ===Reference===
    1 KB (196 words) - 15:48, 30 August 2007
  • ...mework but rather a framework-neutral theory): the body of knowledge about grammar built up over the years by ===Reference===
    1 KB (220 words) - 15:04, 22 January 2009
  • ===Reference=== *[[Otto Jespersen|Jespersen, Otto]]. 1924. ''The philosophy of grammar.'' London: Allen & Unwin.
    1 KB (196 words) - 07:26, 26 June 2007
  • In [[Role and Reference Grammar]]'s clause structure representation (the [[layered structure of the clause]
    408 bytes (58 words) - 07:16, 12 September 2007
  • In [[Role and Reference Grammar]], the '''actor''' is one of the two [[semantic macrorole]]s (actor and [[u
    347 bytes (48 words) - 07:25, 12 September 2007
  • ....g. in [[Functional Grammar]] (Dik 1978, 1997) and in [[Role and Reference Grammar]] (Van Valin & LaPolla 1997).
    852 bytes (114 words) - 14:43, 19 September 2007
  • In [[Role and Reference Grammar]], a '''direct core argument''' is a [[core argument (in RRG)|core argument
    274 bytes (41 words) - 18:19, 28 June 2014
  • In [[Role and Reference Grammar]], an '''oblique core argument''' is a [[core argument (in RRG)|core argume
    273 bytes (40 words) - 16:58, 18 July 2014
  • === Reference === *Rosenbaum, Peter S. 1967. ''The grammar of English predicate complement constructions.'' Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    1 KB (161 words) - 18:56, 22 June 2014
  • In [[Role and Reference Grammar]]'s clause structure representation (the [[layered structure of the clause]
    322 bytes (47 words) - 18:05, 20 September 2014
  • '''Anaphoric epithet''' is a [[R-expression]] whose reference depends anaphorically upon some other element. Lasnik, H. 1989. A Restrictive Theory of Transformational Grammar. ''Theoretical Linguistics 4'', .
    741 bytes (107 words) - 13:26, 31 January 2008
  • In [[Role and Reference Grammar]], the '''undergoer''' is one of the two [[semantic macrorole]]s ([[actor (
    410 bytes (57 words) - 19:08, 2 August 2014
  • ...generative, in particular [[Role and Reference Grammar]] and [[Functional Grammar]].
    908 bytes (122 words) - 17:22, 29 June 2014
  • ...logic studies the logic of time by means of tense operators. In [[Montague Grammar]] an intensional logic is used in which a formal distinction can be made be
    867 bytes (127 words) - 17:14, 15 February 2009

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)