Search results

Create the page "Logical structure" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

• Necessary truth
  ...truth''' is a sentence which is [[truth|true]] by virtue of its [[logical structure]]. sentence (i) is necessarily true due to the meaning of the [[logical constant]]s ''every, or'', independently of the words ''raven'' and ''black
  747 bytes (107 words) - 19:44, 17 February 2009
• Transformational rule
  ...]] by means of [[transformation]]s, and [[Logical Form]] is derived from S-structure in a similar way. See [[affect alpha]].
  662 bytes (84 words) - 19:48, 29 August 2014
• Projection Principle
  ...ch syntactic level of representation ([[D-structure]], [[S-structure]], [[Logical Form]]). The Projection Principle entails that sentence (i) cannot have the structure in (ii).
  1 KB (174 words) - 12:56, 20 February 2009
• By-phrase
  ...[[adjunct]] in a [[passive]] construction headed by by and containing the logical subject. In (i) the ''by''-phrase contains ''Vitesse'', the logical subject of ''won'' (cf. ''Vitesse won the match''). As shown by (ii), ''by'
  1 KB (152 words) - 13:33, 31 March 2008
• Passive
  ...he [[logical object]] shows up as the [[grammatical subject]], while the [[logical subject]] is not expressed at all or shows up in an adjunct [[by-phrase]]. ...is in fact the sum of a cluster of properties (logical object as subject, logical subject as optional adjunct, passive morphology on the verb, no Case assign
  4 KB (558 words) - 16:50, 19 February 2009
• Logical form
  ...the grammatical form of a sentence is often misleading with respect to its logical properties, for example in the case of [[definite description]]s. ...uage) and its logical form (in the semantic sense). LF is derived from [[S-structure]] through instances of [[affect alpha]], e.g. [[Quantifier Raising]] and ''
  2 KB (326 words) - 18:51, 12 July 2014
• Bracketing paradox
  ...one would like to propose for semantic reasons does not correspond to the structure one would like to propose for phonological reasons. ...'not more happy' with reversed [[scope]]. Hence the semantically motivated structure is ''[[un happy] er]''.
  4 KB (495 words) - 05:59, 29 March 2008
• Across-the-Board
  ...ss-the-board''' (ATB) if they may affect all [[conjunct]]s in a coordinate structure at the same time. Williams, E. 1978. Discourse and Logical Form. ''Linguistic Inquiry 8-1'', 101-139.
  756 bytes (112 words) - 13:45, 17 January 2008
• Cliticization
  ...ology to Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), ''The Structure of Phonological Representations (I),'' 131-175. ...ences of Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), ''The Structure of Phonological Representations (I),'' 131-175.
  1 KB (155 words) - 15:32, 28 April 2008
• Semantic representation
  ...e an autonomous level of representation related to deep structure, surface structure and/or LF. See [[meaning theories]].
  1 KB (192 words) - 18:28, 28 October 2014
• Cumulative reference
  ...at characterizes a [[mass noun]] like ''water'' in terms of the cumulative structure of its [[extension]]. *Link, G. 1983. The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: a lattice-theoretical approach. In ''Me
  934 bytes (137 words) - 16:12, 22 May 2008
• Logische Form
  *J. Bayer, Directionality and Logical Form: on the Scope of Focusing Particles and Wh-in-situ. Dordrecht 1996. *S. Berman, On the Semantics and Logical Form of WH-Clauses. Diss. MIT Cambridge , Mass. 1991.
  6 KB (856 words) - 06:57, 17 October 2007
• Co-analysis
  ...account for this [[ambiguity]], Williams & Di Sciullo assign a co-analyzed structure to the [[NP]] ''the man's'', cf. (iv): *Williams, E. 1979. Discourse and Logical Form. ''Linguistic Inquiry 8-1,'' 101-139.
  2 KB (235 words) - 10:15, 29 April 2008
• Quantifier Raising
  * Hoeksema, J. 1987. ''Relating Word Structure and Logical Form,'' [[Linguistic Inquiry]] 18, pp. 119-126 * May, Robert 1985. ''Logical form,'' MIT Press
  2 KB (348 words) - 08:01, 28 September 2014
• VP-adjunction
  This structure is ruled out, because there are two [[barrier]]s between ''who'' and its tr * May, Robert 1985. ''Logical form,'' MIT Press
  2 KB (268 words) - 10:46, 31 August 2014
• T-model
  ...lent in the [[Principles and Parameters framework]], which has the general structure in (i): ...et the demands of [[Case]] theory, and possibly [[Binding Theory]]. LF ( [[Logical Form]]) is derived from SS through the application of affect alpha (e.g [[Q
  2 KB (303 words) - 07:06, 17 August 2014
• Clitic
  ...ology to Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), ''The Structure of Phonological Representations (I),'' 131-175. ...ences of Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), ''The Structure of Phonological Representations (I),'' 131-175.
  3 KB (438 words) - 15:04, 28 April 2008
• Meaning theories
  ...correspondence theory of meaning). The denotational theory is typical of [[logical semantics]] which is [[truth condition]]al and [[model]]-theoretic (Montagu ...eory: [[Katz-Fodor-semantics]], [[Generative Semantics]], and [[Conceptual Structure]] (Jackendoff 1983).
  3 KB (358 words) - 18:19, 17 February 2009
• Inflection
  * Chomsky, N. 1955. ''The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory,'' University of Chicago Press, Chicago(1975). ...logy to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological Representations (I), pp.131-175
  3 KB (418 words) - 21:53, 8 February 2021
• Lexeme (in neurocognitive linguistics)
  ...come into play in extra-linguistic activity. But there is one node at the logical top of the functional web, the cardinal node, the lemma node. For most, if ...he different concepts which the lexeme can represent. So this part of the structure, as you can see, is purely ''relational''.
  4 KB (712 words) - 06:35, 8 October 2017

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)