Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...tactic component, and the postlexical component. Another term used for the lexical component is [[Lexicon]]. [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Lexical+component&lemmacode=604 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    911 bytes (131 words) - 20:26, 16 February 2009
  • ...of Kiparsky's (1982) model of Lexical Morphology/Phonology. Within Cyclic Phonology it is assumed that cyclicity is a stipulated property of rules, and that cy Underived lexical items L
    4 KB (545 words) - 20:21, 16 February 2009
  • *Klavans, J. 1982. From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), ''The Structure of Phonological R *Klavans, J. 1985. Some Consequences of Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), ''The Structure of Phonological R
    1 KB (155 words) - 15:32, 28 April 2008
  • ...arsky (1982) stating that internal [[bracket]]s are erased at the end of a lexical [[level]] or [[stratum]]. ...ce of this convention words become phonologically inert at the end of each lexical [[level]], i.e., they can no longer be affected by [[cyclic]] phonological
    2 KB (227 words) - 15:40, 20 April 2008
  • ...nditions on the phonological shape of morphemes are sometimes expressed by lexical [[redundancy rule]]s. * Kiparsky, P. 1982. ''From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological
    1 KB (218 words) - 19:11, 17 February 2009
  • In phonology and morphology, a '''cyclic domain''' is a term used for a morphologically *Kiparsky, P. 1982. From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.) ''The Structure of Phonological Re
    1 KB (145 words) - 18:06, 22 May 2008
  • In phonology and morphology, '''class I/II affix''' is a classification of (English) aff *Kiparsky, P. 1982. From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.) ''The Structure of Phonological Re
    1 KB (200 words) - 13:47, 23 April 2008
  • * Archangeli, D. 1984. ''Underspecification in Yawelmani Phonology and Morphology,'' doct. diss, MIT. * Kiparsky, P. 1982. ''From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological
    1 KB (206 words) - 15:05, 20 February 2009
  • ...rdering has played a central role in the development of the framework of [[Lexical Morphology]]. * Halle, M. & K.P. Mohanan 1985. ''Segmental phonology of Modern English,'' Linguistic Inquiry 16, pp. 57-116
    1 KB (231 words) - 20:19, 16 February 2009
  • '''Structure preservation''' is a property of (lexical) rules which entails that they cannot introduce segments which are not othe * Kiparsky, P. 1985. ''Some Consequences of Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological
    1 KB (207 words) - 09:11, 10 August 2014
  • *Halle, M. & Mohanan, K.P. 1985. Segmental phonology of Modern English. ''Linguistic Inquiry 16,'' 57-116. *Kiparsky, P. 1982. From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology. In ''The Structure of Phonological Representations (I).'' van der Hulst, H
    1 KB (145 words) - 14:54, 7 May 2008
  • ...Pairs of sister nodes are labeled Weak-Strong or Strong-Weak (or by the [[Lexical Category Prominence]] Rule). *Nespor, M. and I. Vogel (1986) Prosodic Phonology, Foris, Dordrecht.
    2 KB (243 words) - 08:24, 15 October 2007
  • * Kiparsky, P. 1982. ''From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological
    864 bytes (126 words) - 20:00, 17 February 2009
  • * Archangeli, D. 1984. ''Underspecification in Yawelmani Phonology and Morphology,'' doct. diss, MIT. * Kiparsky, P. 1982. ''From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological
    961 bytes (130 words) - 08:11, 16 August 2014
  • A '''loop''' is a device first introduced into the theory of [[Lexical Morphology]] by Mohanan (1986). This device opens the possibility to return * Halle, M. & K.P. Mohanan 1985. ''Segmental phonology of Modern English,'' Linguistic Inquiry 16, pp. 57-116
    1 KB (213 words) - 10:14, 17 February 2009
  • In lexical semantics, feature matrices can be used to determine the meaning of specifi In phonology, a feature matrices are used to specify the [[feature]]s of a sound segment
    648 bytes (97 words) - 13:55, 14 June 2009
  • ...follows form this condition that cyclic rules cannot operate on underived lexical items. * Halle, M. 1978. ''Formal versus Functional Considerations in Phonology,'' Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    2 KB (216 words) - 08:50, 10 August 2014
  • * Archangeli, D. 1984. ''Underspecification in Yawelmani Phonology and Morphology,'' doct. diss, MIT. * Kiparsky, P. 1982. ''From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological
    1 KB (146 words) - 13:55, 9 June 2009
  • ...list or network of [[word]]s or [[lexical entry|lexical entries]] (also [[lexical item]]s, [[lexeme]]s). It contains information about (a) the [[pronunciatio ...a speaker's mind, and as an extensional (e.g. printed, electronic) list of lexical items from a given language.
    3 KB (472 words) - 09:02, 26 May 2013
  • ...logy are intertwined, i.e., it is assumed that the rules of morphology and phonology apply within a single component: the Lexicon (e.g. Siegel 1974, Pesetsky 19 * Kiparsky, P. 1982. ''From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological
    2 KB (339 words) - 19:18, 17 February 2009

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)