Difference between revisions of "Specified subject condition"

From Glottopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Edited the format and removed the block {{format}})
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Definition==
 
The '''Specified Subject Condition''' is a condition introduced in Chomsky (1973) which states that:
 
The '''Specified Subject Condition''' is a condition introduced in Chomsky (1973) which states that:
  
Line 12: Line 13:
 
The specified subject ''John'' in (iii) blocks the binding relation between ''the men'' and ''each other''. In later work, the SSC is subsumed under the [[binding theory]].
 
The specified subject ''John'' in (iii) blocks the binding relation between ''the men'' and ''each other''. In later work, the SSC is subsumed under the [[binding theory]].
  
=== Links ===
+
== Links ==
 
+
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Specified+Subject+Condition&lemmacode=243 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Specified+Subject+Condition&lemmacode=243 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
 
 
 
=== References ===
 
  
 +
== References ==
 
* Chomsky, N. 1982. ''Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding,'' MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
 
* Chomsky, N. 1982. ''Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding,'' MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
 
* Chomsky, N. 1980. ''On binding,'' Linguistic Inquiry 11-1, pp.1-46
 
* Chomsky, N. 1980. ''On binding,'' Linguistic Inquiry 11-1, pp.1-46
Line 26: Line 25:
 
[[Category:Generative grammar]]
 
[[Category:Generative grammar]]
  
{{stub}}{{cats}}{{format}}
+
{{stub}}{{cats}}

Revision as of 07:36, 16 August 2014

Definition

The Specified Subject Condition is a condition introduced in Chomsky (1973) which states that:

(i)    No rule can involve X, Y in the structure
       ... X ... [a ... Z ... -WYV ... ] ...
       where Z is the specified subject of WYZ in a

Informally, a subject is specified if it is overt. Therefore, the reciprocal each other can be bound by the men in (ii), but not in (iii):

(ii)	The men saw [NP the pictures of each other]
(iii)  *The men saw [NP John's pictures of each other]

The specified subject John in (iii) blocks the binding relation between the men and each other. In later work, the SSC is subsumed under the binding theory.

Links

References

  • Chomsky, N. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  • Chomsky, N. 1980. On binding, Linguistic Inquiry 11-1, pp.1-46
  • Chomsky, N. 1973. Conditions on transformations, in: S.R. Anderson & P. Kiparsky, A festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
STUB
CAT This article needs proper categorization. You can help Glottopedia by categorizing it
Please do not remove this block until the problem is fixed.