Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...namely the [[base]], did not previously exist. If this new base becomes a word of the language, it is called a back-formation. ...e literature, the existence of back-formation is taken as evidence for a [[word-based morphology]].
    1 KB (195 words) - 14:46, 3 March 2008
  • ...'''base''' is a bigger unit to which an [[affix]] attaches or to which a [[morphological process]] applies. ...' meaning of a word. The term ''stem'' will be reserved for that part of a word to which inflectional affixes are added, and ''base'' for that part to whic
    1 KB (149 words) - 18:26, 20 June 2014
  • .... the property that no syntactic process is allowed to refer to parts of a word. * Di Sciullo, A. M. and E. Williams 1987. ''On the Definition of Word,'' MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass.
    1 KB (173 words) - 20:49, 16 February 2009
  • '''Polysemy''' is the phenomenon that a [[word]] acquires new usages which, over time, are likely to become more like new The phenomenon that a word has several different meanings which are closely related to each other. The
    948 bytes (136 words) - 18:56, 27 September 2014
  • ...rgument]] of the [[base]] becomes the [[internal argument]] of the derived word. Internalization has two stages. First, the addition of a new external argu * Di Sciullo, A. M. and E. Williams 1987. ''On the Definition of Word,'' MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass.
    1 KB (144 words) - 17:21, 15 February 2009
  • ...as being productive. Productive word formation is opposed to unproductive word formation. * Aronoff, M. 1976. ''Word Formation in Generative Grammar,'' MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass.
    2 KB (240 words) - 12:54, 20 February 2009
  • ...ogy''' (also called inflectional morphology) is a term which is used for a morphological system in which one morpheme, usually an inflectional affix, expresses seve ...nts '3rd person possessive' and 'plural' are fused together in the English word ''their'', while Turkish uses two morphemes for these components: ''evlerid
    908 bytes (111 words) - 17:25, 18 May 2014
  • ...In Kiparsky's view this inertness extends to morphological processes, and word formation rules therefore do not have access to the internal structure of w *Spencer, A. 1991. ''Morphological Theory.'' Oxford: Blackwell.
    2 KB (227 words) - 15:40, 20 April 2008
  • * Allen, M.R. 1978. ''Morphological Investigations,'' PhD diss. Univ. of Connecticut. * Spencer, A. 1991. ''Morphological Theory,'' Blackwell, Oxford.
    1 KB (206 words) - 16:52, 13 February 2009
  • ...nt on concatenative [[word formation]] which says that in the process of [[word formation]] only two morphemes can be concatenated at the same time. *Spencer, A. 1991. ''Morphological Theory.'' Oxford: Blackwell.
    1 KB (154 words) - 04:06, 13 March 2008
  • The English word ''dog'' is a free morpheme. * Spencer, A. 1991. ''Morphological Theory,'' Blackwell, Oxford.
    487 bytes (64 words) - 13:21, 14 February 2009
  • ...n runs as follows. He assigns the structure [hydro [electric+ity]] to this word, and due to the principle of Lexical Relatedness he can relate </nowiki>''h
    1 KB (177 words) - 20:50, 16 February 2009
  • * Aronoff, M. 1976. ''Word Formation in Generative Grammar,'' MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass. * Halle, M. 1973. ''Prolegomena to a Theory of Word-Formation,'' Linguistic Inquiry 4, pp. 451-464
    1 KB (151 words) - 20:31, 12 February 2009
  • ...keting paradox''' is a situation in which the morphological structure of a word which one would like to propose for semantic reasons does not correspond to ...ver, this structure raises a problem of interpretation. The meaning of the word ''unhappier'' can be paraphrased as 'more not happy', i.e. with more having
    4 KB (495 words) - 05:59, 29 March 2008
  • In ''That's good'', the host of the clitic '''s'' is the word ''that''. ...so sometimes used as a synonym of [[base]], i.e. as 'host of an affix or a morphological process'.
    499 bytes (73 words) - 16:00, 15 February 2009
  • ...ch previously belonged to a different domain of grammar become part of the morphological system of a language. ...ical processes and syntactic structures [...] become properly an aspect of morphological, rather than phonological or syntactic, organization" (Fox 1995: 102). As p
    2 KB (343 words) - 16:21, 29 October 2007
  • '''Agglutinating language''' is a language which has a morphological system in which words as a rule are polymorphemic and where each [[morpheme ...viation]]s from it. This traditional classification of languages into four morphological groups has been criticized for being both incoherent and useless.
    1 KB (191 words) - 15:28, 18 May 2014
  • ...The first approach (e.g. Halle 1973, Halle &amp; Vergnaud 1987) proposes a morphological component which is autonomous from syntax as well as phonology. In the seco [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Morphological+component&lemmacode=567 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    2 KB (339 words) - 19:18, 17 February 2009
  • * Aronoff, M. 1976. ''Word Formation in Generative Grammar,'' MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass. * Spencer, A. 1991. ''Morphological Theory,'' Blackwell, Oxford.
    680 bytes (91 words) - 20:06, 16 February 2009
  • ...d by a morphological rule. Intuitively, the Adjacency Condition prevents a word formation rule from looking into the entire derivational history of morphol *Allen, M.R. 1978. Morphological Investigations, PhD diss. Univ. of Connecticut.
    2 KB (315 words) - 15:17, 22 January 2008

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)