Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...s a minimum for the size of [[lexical word]]s. In English, for example, a lexical word cannot be shorter than two [[mora]]s: either a [[heavy syllable]], tha ...ke English, does not possess a minimal word constraint: accordingly French lexical words may consist of a single light syllable: ''eau'' [o] `water', feu [f&o
    873 bytes (140 words) - 16:16, 13 July 2014
  • In phonology, the '''Maximal Onset Principle''' is a principle determining underlying [[ * Kahn, Daniel (1976) Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
    944 bytes (130 words) - 14:42, 1 February 2010
  • *Klavans, J. 1982. From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), ''The Structure of Phonological R *Klavans, J. 1985. Some Consequences of Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), ''The Structure of Phonological R
    3 KB (438 words) - 15:04, 28 April 2008
  • * Kiparsky, P. 1982. ''From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological
    1 KB (176 words) - 18:49, 12 February 2009
  • * Kiparsky, P. 1982. ''From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological
    1 KB (206 words) - 16:52, 13 February 2009
  • *Kiparsky, P. 1982. From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology. In ''The Structure of Phonological Representations (I).'' van der Hulst, H ...al Conversion within a Restricted Theory of the Lexicon. In ''The Scope of Lexical Rules.'' Moortgat et al. (eds.), pages. Dordrecht: Foris.
    2 KB (245 words) - 17:32, 18 May 2008
  • ...an & Prince (1977) to provide the nodes of a metrical tree ([[metrical phonology]]) with labels ''strong'' or ''weak'' expressing prominence in systems wher [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Lexical+category+prominence&lemmacode=603 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    1 KB (195 words) - 20:24, 16 February 2009
  • ...existing word. Both the new word and the existing one are members of major lexical categories. * Kiparsky, P. 1982. ''From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological
    2 KB (301 words) - 19:12, 17 February 2009
  • *Kiparsky, P. 1982. From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.) ''The Structure of Phonological Re
    1 KB (195 words) - 12:26, 20 March 2008
  • ...he ELOH is of great importance in the development of the theory of Lexical Phonology/Morphology (e.g. Kiparsky (1982)). However, the claims of the ELOH have not * Halle, M. & K.P. Mohanan 1985. ''Segmental phonology of Modern English,'' Linguistic Inquiry 16, pp. 57-116
    2 KB (272 words) - 16:12, 8 July 2009
  • ...alled [[tone language]]s, a difference in [[pitch]] is used to distinguish lexical items. In such languages tone is a [[distinctive feature]]. The most common In [[Margi]] we find the following lexical items:
    944 bytes (152 words) - 18:57, 29 August 2014
  • ...Pesetsky's (1979) and Kiparsky's (1982) theories of [[Lexical Morphology]]/Phonology. These theories propose morphological structures on the basis of level-orde *Kiparsky, P. 1982. From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology. In ''The Structure of Phonological Representations (I).'' van der Hulst, H
    4 KB (495 words) - 05:59, 29 March 2008
  • ===Features in Phonology=== In phonology, a feature can be regarded as a property of a [[segment|sound segment]]. Se
    4 KB (612 words) - 19:54, 24 July 2010
  • ...[[tone]] carried by a [[word]] determines the meaning of that word (i.e. [[lexical tone]]). Thus, tone languages use tonal contrasts to distinguish word meani [[Category:Phonetics and Phonology]]
    548 bytes (75 words) - 18:51, 29 August 2014
  • *[[Lexical Morphology]] [[Category:Phonology]]
    825 bytes (112 words) - 18:12, 22 May 2008
  • ...ionalize''. Derivation typically, but not necessarily, induces a change in lexical category. Traditionally derivation is distinguished from [[inflection]] (th * Kiparsky, P. 1982. ''From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological
    3 KB (369 words) - 18:48, 12 February 2009
  • ...sses, their parts presumably being inaccessible for syntactic rules. See [[lexical integrity]]. ===In phonology ===
    2 KB (281 words) - 09:27, 16 July 2022
  • * Kiparsky, P. 1982. ''From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological
    1 KB (190 words) - 22:34, 18 December 2013
  • *Bochner, H. 1988. The forms of Words: a Theory of Lexical Relationships, PhD diss. Harvard Univ. Cambridge. [[Category:Phonetics and Phonology]]
    1 KB (183 words) - 13:29, 17 January 2008
  • * Selkirk, E.O. 1984. ''Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure,'' Cambridge, Mass., M ...,'' in: M. Moortgat, H. Van der Hulst & T. Hoestra (eds.) The Scope of Lexical Rules, Foris, Dordrecht.
    3 KB (370 words) - 22:21, 13 February 2009

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)