Difference between revisions of "Line (in relational network theory)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) m (Line moved to Line (in relational network theory)) |
(added a category) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In the notations used by [[relational network theory]], a '''line''' connects [[node (in neurocognitive linguistics)|nodes]] | + | In the notations used by [[relational network theory]], a '''line''' connects [[node (in neurocognitive linguistics)|nodes]]. Lines often have labels next to them in order to make network diagrams easier to read; the labels are not part of the structure. |
Connections differ in strength. A line of a given strength may carry varying degrees of activation. It is not the case that you just have a line connecting two points to indicate an interrelationship or else you don't. You can have lines of varying degrees of strength, from a slight, tenuous connection to a strong one. Like a pathway going through a field or a jungle, the more it gets used, the easier it is to use the next time. | Connections differ in strength. A line of a given strength may carry varying degrees of activation. It is not the case that you just have a line connecting two points to indicate an interrelationship or else you don't. You can have lines of varying degrees of strength, from a slight, tenuous connection to a strong one. Like a pathway going through a field or a jungle, the more it gets used, the easier it is to use the next time. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === In Compact vs. Narrow Notation === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * All lines in ''expanded'' or [[narrow relational network notation|narrow notation]] are one-way lines. | ||
| + | * Lines of [[compact relational network notation|compact notation]] are bidirectional; they are like lines on a highway map for divided highways -- really a pair of oppositely directed lines but drawn as one, just to keep the map from being too cluttered. | ||
=== Sources === | === Sources === | ||
| − | *[http:// | + | *[[Sydney M. Lamb|Lamb, Sydney M.]]. 2004. '' [http://books.google.com/books/about/Language_and_Reality.html?id=vrlPUxB2_JwC Language and Reality: Selected Writings of Sydney Lamb].'' London: Continuum. |
| − | *[http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~lngbrain LangBrain] | + | *[http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~lngbrain LangBrain] |
| + | |||
| + | === See Also === | ||
| + | *[[Conditioning line]] | ||
{{dc}} | {{dc}} | ||
| + | [[Category:En]] | ||
[[Category:DICT]] | [[Category:DICT]] | ||
| − | |||
[[Category:Grammar]] | [[Category:Grammar]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Stratificational_Grammar]] | ||
Latest revision as of 06:13, 8 October 2017
In the notations used by relational network theory, a line connects nodes. Lines often have labels next to them in order to make network diagrams easier to read; the labels are not part of the structure.
Connections differ in strength. A line of a given strength may carry varying degrees of activation. It is not the case that you just have a line connecting two points to indicate an interrelationship or else you don't. You can have lines of varying degrees of strength, from a slight, tenuous connection to a strong one. Like a pathway going through a field or a jungle, the more it gets used, the easier it is to use the next time.
In Compact vs. Narrow Notation
- All lines in expanded or narrow notation are one-way lines.
- Lines of compact notation are bidirectional; they are like lines on a highway map for divided highways -- really a pair of oppositely directed lines but drawn as one, just to keep the map from being too cluttered.
Sources
- Lamb, Sydney M.. 2004. Language and Reality: Selected Writings of Sydney Lamb. London: Continuum.
- LangBrain
