Difference between revisions of "Gapping"

From Glottopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Comments)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{other}}
+
'''Gapping''' is a kind of ellipsis construction in which repeated verbs in coordinate structures are omitted. The term was introduced by Ross (1967) as a kind of [[conjunction reduction]] rule.
  
===Other languages===
+
===Example===
*German [[Gapping (de)]]
+
See the following example from English where the application of gapping on (1a) results in (1b).
 
+
{{dc}}
+
[[Category:Syntax]]
+
Gapping was introduced by Ross (1967) as a conjunction reduction rule that deletes the repeated verbs in coordinate structures. See the following example from English where the application of gapping on (1a) results in (1b).
+
  
 
(1) Gapping (borrowed from Ross 1967):
 
(1) Gapping (borrowed from Ross 1967):
(a) The boy works in a skyscraper and the girl works in a quonset hut.
 
(b) The boy works in a skyscraper and the girl in a quonset hut.
 
  
Some languages have "forward gapping" as shown in English (1) above, the common verb in the second conjunct clause is deleted. However, some languages have "backward gapping", thus the common verb from the first conjunct clause may also be deleted.
+
(a) ''The boy works in a skyscraper and the girl works in a quonset hut.''
  
Gapping is assumed to have properties, such as  (i) it needs to have lexical material on both its sides, it must occur in a coordinate structure, it may not be a phrase, it may not occur at the sentence boundary or violate complex NP constraint  (Lobeck 1995), the gapped elements must be contextually given and the remnants must occur in a contrastive relation to their correlates (Winkler 1997 as mentioned in Winkler 2005, Johnson 1996).  
+
(b) ''The boy works in a skyscraper and the girl in a quonset hut.''
  
There are two competing analyses for the mechanism of the gapping phenomenon, viz. the deletion of the material, and the across-the board movement of the material from both the conjuncts, these both achieve the similar results.  
+
Some languages have "[[forward gapping]]" as shown in English (1) above, the common verb in the second conjunct clause is deleted. However, some languages have "[[backward gapping]]", thus the common verb from the first conjunct clause may also be deleted.
  
References:
+
===Comments===
  
1. Johnson, K. (1996) In search of the middle field. ms. Accessed at http://people.umass.edu/kbj/homepage/index_johnson.htm.
+
Gapping is assumed to have properties such as the following:  (i) it needs to have lexical material on both its sides, it must occur in a coordinate structure, it may not be a phrase, it may not occur at the sentence boundary or violate complex NP constraint  (Lobeck 1995), the gapped elements must be contextually given and the remnants must occur in a contrastive relation to their correlates (Winkler 1997 as mentioned in Winkler 2005, Johnson 1996).  
  
2. Lobeck, A. (1995) Ellipsis. Oxford University Press.
+
There are two competing analyses for the mechanism of the gapping phenomenon, viz. the deletion of the material, and the across-the board movement of the material from both the conjuncts, which both achieve the similar results.
  
3. Neijt, A. (1979) Gapping: A Contribution to Sentence Grammar. Foris Publications. Dordrecht.
+
===Related terms===
 +
*[[subgapping]]
 +
*[[long-distance gapping]]
 +
*[[stripping]]
  
4. Ross, J.R. (1967) Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD Dissertation. MIT.
+
=== Link ===
  
5. Winkler, S. (2005) Ellipsis and Focus in Generative Grammar. Mouton de Gruyter. Berlin. New York.
+
[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Gapping&lemmacode=714 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
 +
 
 +
=== References ===
 +
* Johnson, K. (1996) In search of the middle field. ms. Accessed at http://people.umass.edu/kbj/homepage/index_johnson.htm.
 +
* Kerstens,J.G 1981. ''Bestaart Gapping eigenlijk wel?,'' Spektator 11-1, 61-79
 +
* Koster, J. 1987. ''Domains and dynasties: The radical autonomy of syntax,'' Foris, Dordrecht.
 +
* Lobeck, A. (1995) Ellipsis. Oxford University Press.
 +
* Neijt,A.H. 1979. ''Gapping. A contribution to sentence grammar,'' Foris:Dordrecht
 +
* Ross, J.R. 1967. ''Constraints on variables in syntax,'' doctoral dissertation, MIT (published as 'Infinite syntax!' Ablex, Norwood (1986)).
 +
* Winkler, S. (2005) Ellipsis and Focus in Generative Grammar. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin/ New York.
 +
 
 +
===Other languages===
 +
*German [[Gapping (de)]]
 +
 
 +
{{dc}}
 +
[[Category:Syntax]]
 +
[[Category:Ellipsis]]

Latest revision as of 18:55, 17 March 2009

Gapping is a kind of ellipsis construction in which repeated verbs in coordinate structures are omitted. The term was introduced by Ross (1967) as a kind of conjunction reduction rule.

Example

See the following example from English where the application of gapping on (1a) results in (1b).

(1) Gapping (borrowed from Ross 1967):

(a) The boy works in a skyscraper and the girl works in a quonset hut.

(b) The boy works in a skyscraper and the girl in a quonset hut.

Some languages have "forward gapping" as shown in English (1) above, the common verb in the second conjunct clause is deleted. However, some languages have "backward gapping", thus the common verb from the first conjunct clause may also be deleted.

Comments

Gapping is assumed to have properties such as the following: (i) it needs to have lexical material on both its sides, it must occur in a coordinate structure, it may not be a phrase, it may not occur at the sentence boundary or violate complex NP constraint (Lobeck 1995), the gapped elements must be contextually given and the remnants must occur in a contrastive relation to their correlates (Winkler 1997 as mentioned in Winkler 2005, Johnson 1996).

There are two competing analyses for the mechanism of the gapping phenomenon, viz. the deletion of the material, and the across-the board movement of the material from both the conjuncts, which both achieve the similar results.

Related terms

Link

Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics

References

  • Johnson, K. (1996) In search of the middle field. ms. Accessed at http://people.umass.edu/kbj/homepage/index_johnson.htm.
  • Kerstens,J.G 1981. Bestaart Gapping eigenlijk wel?, Spektator 11-1, 61-79
  • Koster, J. 1987. Domains and dynasties: The radical autonomy of syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.
  • Lobeck, A. (1995) Ellipsis. Oxford University Press.
  • Neijt,A.H. 1979. Gapping. A contribution to sentence grammar, Foris:Dordrecht
  • Ross, J.R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax, doctoral dissertation, MIT (published as 'Infinite syntax!' Ablex, Norwood (1986)).
  • Winkler, S. (2005) Ellipsis and Focus in Generative Grammar. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin/ New York.

Other languages