Difference between revisions of "Core argument (in RRG)"

From Glottopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: In more recent versions of Role and Reference Grammar, a '''core argument''' is simply an argument of the clause, i.e. an element that is required by the verb's valency. *"Co...)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
In more recent versions of [[Role and Reference Grammar]], a '''core argument''' is simply an [[argument]] of the clause, i.e. an element that is required by the verb's [[valency]].
 
In more recent versions of [[Role and Reference Grammar]], a '''core argument''' is simply an [[argument]] of the clause, i.e. an element that is required by the verb's [[valency]].
  
*"Core arguments are those arguments which are part of the semantic representation of the verb." (Van Valin & LaPolla 1997:26)
+
:::*''"Core arguments are those arguments which are part of the semantic representation of the verb."'' (Van Valin & LaPolla 1997:26)
  
 
===Comments===
 
===Comments===
Line 19: Line 18:
  
 
{{dc}}
 
{{dc}}
[[Category:Role and Reference Grammar]]
+
[[Category:Syntax]]
 +
[[Category:RRG]]

Latest revision as of 07:13, 12 September 2007

In more recent versions of Role and Reference Grammar, a core argument is simply an argument of the clause, i.e. an element that is required by the verb's valency.

  • "Core arguments are those arguments which are part of the semantic representation of the verb." (Van Valin & LaPolla 1997:26)

Comments

In earlier versions of Role and Reference Grammar, there was also a notion of peripheral argument (Foley & Van Valin 1984). In the more recent versions, there is no apparently no distinction between core argument and argument.

Synonym

Subtypes

Reference

  • Foley, William A. & Van Valin, Jr., Robert D. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Van Valin, Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.