Difference between revisions of "Signification"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wohlgemuth (talk | contribs) m (utrecht) |
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | '''Signification''' is the [[Structuralism|structuralist]] notion for being a [[sign]], i.e. the property of expressions that they stand for other things. A sign is viewed as a composite unit consisting of a relation between an overt signal (the [[signifier]]) and the information that this overt signal evokes (the [[signified]]). | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | '''Signification''' is the [[Structuralism|structuralist]] notion for being a [[sign]], i.e. the property of expressions that they stand for other things. A sign is viewed as a composite unit consisting of a relation between an overt signal (the [[signifier]]) and the information that this overt signal evokes (the [[signified]] | ||
===See also=== | ===See also=== | ||
| − | * [[ | + | * [[denotation]] |
| − | * [[ | + | * [[reference]] |
| + | * [[meaning]] | ||
=== Links === | === Links === | ||
| Line 19: | Line 17: | ||
{{dc}} | {{dc}} | ||
[[Category:Semantics]] | [[Category:Semantics]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{stub}}{{cats}} | ||
Latest revision as of 21:06, 4 March 2009
Signification is the structuralist notion for being a sign, i.e. the property of expressions that they stand for other things. A sign is viewed as a composite unit consisting of a relation between an overt signal (the signifier) and the information that this overt signal evokes (the signified).
See also
Links
Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics
References
- Frawley, W. 1992. Linguistic semantics, Laurence Erlbaum Associates:New York/London.
- Lyons, J 1977. Semantics (2 volumes), Cambridge University Press:Cambridge.
| STUB |
| CAT | This article needs proper categorization. You can help Glottopedia by categorizing it Please do not remove this block until the problem is fixed. |
