Difference between revisions of "Talk:Punctuation"
Wohlgemuth (talk | contribs) m (Wohlgemuth moved page User talk:Terran/Draft to Talk:Punctuation) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
--[[User:Ulisng|Ulisng]] ([[User talk:Ulisng|talk]]) 15:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Maybe you can add the last sentence of the first paragraph with information that you will then explain the various types of Punctuation along with some functions and examples of their use so that readers are not confused about what context you provide in the next subheading. | --[[User:Ulisng|Ulisng]] ([[User talk:Ulisng|talk]]) 15:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Maybe you can add the last sentence of the first paragraph with information that you will then explain the various types of Punctuation along with some functions and examples of their use so that readers are not confused about what context you provide in the next subheading. | ||
| + | <br>--[[User:Terran|Terran]] ([[User talk:Terran|talk]]) Hi! Thank you for your suggestion but I think it's not necessary to add more information such as what will I explain in the next subheading because it's not an essay. As people can see in my lemma, that alone already give people hint about what this article discusses. | ||
| + | <br>--[[User:Brigittaaemilia|Brigittaaemilia]] ([[User talk:Brigittaaemilia|talk]]) 07:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC) Nice article! I have a little suggestion: maybe you can use numbering format instead of using (.) so it is easier to read. Other else is fine! Keep up the good work! | ||
| + | <br>--[[User:Terran|Terran]] ([[User talk:Terran|talk]]) Thank you for your compliment as well as the suggestion! I don't think using numbering will do any better in the first place. I used bulleted list (.) instead of numbered list (1, 2, 3) because some of the punctuation marks only have 1 function, which if there's only 1 with no further functions it will look kind of weird and that doesn't sit right with me. | ||
Latest revision as of 06:42, 11 June 2024
--Ulisng (talk) 15:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Maybe you can add the last sentence of the first paragraph with information that you will then explain the various types of Punctuation along with some functions and examples of their use so that readers are not confused about what context you provide in the next subheading.
--Terran (talk) Hi! Thank you for your suggestion but I think it's not necessary to add more information such as what will I explain in the next subheading because it's not an essay. As people can see in my lemma, that alone already give people hint about what this article discusses.
--Brigittaaemilia (talk) 07:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC) Nice article! I have a little suggestion: maybe you can use numbering format instead of using (.) so it is easier to read. Other else is fine! Keep up the good work!
--Terran (talk) Thank you for your compliment as well as the suggestion! I don't think using numbering will do any better in the first place. I used bulleted list (.) instead of numbered list (1, 2, 3) because some of the punctuation marks only have 1 function, which if there's only 1 with no further functions it will look kind of weird and that doesn't sit right with me.
