Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Page title matches

  • In morphology, '''bracketing paradox''' is a situation in which the morphological structure of a word which one A well-known case of a bracketing paradox independent of level-ordering (see [[Level Ordering Hypothesis]]) involves
    4 KB (495 words) - 05:59, 29 March 2008
  • '''Bach-Peters paradox''' refers to a paradox in the description of sentences such as (i), first noted by Emmon Bach and ...rm must be both equal and unequal to another term). In the case of (i) the paradox is avoided if the description is something like (ii).
    1 KB (217 words) - 14:18, 3 March 2008
  • '''Liar's paradox''' is the [[paradox]] discovered by the Greek [[Stoics]] of which sentence (i) is the simplest ...false. Conversely, if sentence (i) is false, it has to be true. The liar's paradox can be avoided by prohibiting that an expression refers to itself, i.e. by
    781 bytes (120 words) - 20:55, 16 February 2009

Page text matches

  • '''Bach-Peters paradox''' refers to a paradox in the description of sentences such as (i), first noted by Emmon Bach and ...rm must be both equal and unequal to another term). In the case of (i) the paradox is avoided if the description is something like (ii).
    1 KB (217 words) - 14:18, 3 March 2008
  • '''Liar's paradox''' is the [[paradox]] discovered by the Greek [[Stoics]] of which sentence (i) is the simplest ...false. Conversely, if sentence (i) is false, it has to be true. The liar's paradox can be avoided by prohibiting that an expression refers to itself, i.e. by
    781 bytes (120 words) - 20:55, 16 February 2009
  • This rule accounts for cases of crossed binding at [[LF]] (see [[Bach-Peters paradox]]), and has been proposed as an account of the interpretation of [[multiple
    960 bytes (142 words) - 12:55, 17 January 2008
  • In morphology, '''bracketing paradox''' is a situation in which the morphological structure of a word which one A well-known case of a bracketing paradox independent of level-ordering (see [[Level Ordering Hypothesis]]) involves
    4 KB (495 words) - 05:59, 29 March 2008
  • ...ject language either. The distinction was introduced to avoid the [[liar's paradox]].
    742 bytes (104 words) - 07:54, 15 October 2007
  • *Dillard, J. L. 1970. Principles in the history of American English: Paradox, virginity, cafeteria. ''Florida FL Reporter'' 7: 32-33.
    784 bytes (103 words) - 18:08, 25 November 2007
  • ...y proposes the Mapping Principle to account for the so-called [[bracketing paradox]]es. A standard example of a bracketing paradox is ''ungrammaticality''. The phono-morphological representation of this for
    2 KB (277 words) - 18:04, 21 September 2014
  • ...'' is a principle proposed in Williams (1981a) to account for [[bracketing paradox]]es, which says that X can be related to Y if X and Y differ only in a head
    1 KB (177 words) - 20:50, 16 February 2009
  • ...ues that QR can be used to solve the problem of the so-called [[bracketing paradox]]es.
    2 KB (348 words) - 08:01, 28 September 2014
  • ...reject this model primarily on the basis of the existence of [[bracketing paradox]]es, and basically return to the SPE-model in which morphology and phonolog
    4 KB (545 words) - 20:21, 16 February 2009
  • ...rst to lead to massive problems of duplication of meanings and [[inclusion paradox | inclusion paradoxes]]. Thus AUTHOR and BOOKSELLER are included in the mea
    4 KB (612 words) - 18:19, 20 June 2014