Difference between revisions of "User:Alek.storm/Notes"

From Glottopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
* flapping
 
* flapping
 +
* make a better IPA - /b/, /p/, and /p^h/ are *the same* - VOT of following vowel is affected! write only the changes in articulators from one sound to the next. this should also show causes of changes better.
 
* rhyming
 
* rhyming
 
* phonemes underspecified - no "base" form like /n/; place features aren't filled in yet
 
* phonemes underspecified - no "base" form like /n/; place features aren't filled in yet
Line 5: Line 6:
 
* rules and constraints are equivalent *and come in pairs*! - allophony is the speaker fitting mental model onto idiolectal phonotactics (there is a constraint and a repairing rule), just like trying to pronounce a second language - it gets filtered through our phonotactics! we already know that phonemic distinctions in other languages that aren't in our own (even if we have both sounds, but they're allophones) are hard to both detect and produce
 
* rules and constraints are equivalent *and come in pairs*! - allophony is the speaker fitting mental model onto idiolectal phonotactics (there is a constraint and a repairing rule), just like trying to pronounce a second language - it gets filtered through our phonotactics! we already know that phonemic distinctions in other languages that aren't in our own (even if we have both sounds, but they're allophones) are hard to both detect and produce
 
* two parts of language and one process: UG, lexicon; feature spreading through analogy. there is no language-specific grammar or parameters; all features are in bundles in the lexicon and UG handles them. languages have different syntax on the surface -> they have different features (no language has all features). takes care of diachronic syntax changes, analogy, partial analogy, exceptions, new words (/pentium/ couldn't have its 't' dropped at first; now it can - feature spreading!. so phonological rules don't "target" a specific environment, they spread through *analogy*, which does not occur at utterance-time)
 
* two parts of language and one process: UG, lexicon; feature spreading through analogy. there is no language-specific grammar or parameters; all features are in bundles in the lexicon and UG handles them. languages have different syntax on the surface -> they have different features (no language has all features). takes care of diachronic syntax changes, analogy, partial analogy, exceptions, new words (/pentium/ couldn't have its 't' dropped at first; now it can - feature spreading!. so phonological rules don't "target" a specific environment, they spread through *analogy*, which does not occur at utterance-time)
 +
* [+syllabic] is not a feature - it's added on later, during syllabification (includes some nasals, liquids, etc). for sonority hierarchy, use [+vowel] for vowels
 +
* morphemes are injected, *then* ordered. pieces getting swapped means they were in the same place, being processed at the same time. once they're injected, they go through an orderer, which sometimes makes mistakes

Revision as of 15:48, 17 March 2010

  • flapping
  • make a better IPA - /b/, /p/, and /p^h/ are *the same* - VOT of following vowel is affected! write only the changes in articulators from one sound to the next. this should also show causes of changes better.
  • rhyming
  • phonemes underspecified - no "base" form like /n/; place features aren't filled in yet
  • two steps of changes - *actual* change (always articulators?), other features are changed to conform to phonotactics and sympathetically make the sound *acoustically* as similar as possible
  • rules and constraints are equivalent *and come in pairs*! - allophony is the speaker fitting mental model onto idiolectal phonotactics (there is a constraint and a repairing rule), just like trying to pronounce a second language - it gets filtered through our phonotactics! we already know that phonemic distinctions in other languages that aren't in our own (even if we have both sounds, but they're allophones) are hard to both detect and produce
  • two parts of language and one process: UG, lexicon; feature spreading through analogy. there is no language-specific grammar or parameters; all features are in bundles in the lexicon and UG handles them. languages have different syntax on the surface -> they have different features (no language has all features). takes care of diachronic syntax changes, analogy, partial analogy, exceptions, new words (/pentium/ couldn't have its 't' dropped at first; now it can - feature spreading!. so phonological rules don't "target" a specific environment, they spread through *analogy*, which does not occur at utterance-time)
  • [+syllabic] is not a feature - it's added on later, during syllabification (includes some nasals, liquids, etc). for sonority hierarchy, use [+vowel] for vowels
  • morphemes are injected, *then* ordered. pieces getting swapped means they were in the same place, being processed at the same time. once they're injected, they go through an orderer, which sometimes makes mistakes