Difference between revisions of "Uniformity of Theta-Assignment Hypothesis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) |
(Edited the format and removed the block {{format}}) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Definition== | ||
The '''Uniformity of Theta-Assignment Hypothesis (UTAH)''', proposed in Baker (1988), states that identical thematic relationships between items are represented by identical structural relationships between these items at the level of [[D-structure]]. | The '''Uniformity of Theta-Assignment Hypothesis (UTAH)''', proposed in Baker (1988), states that identical thematic relationships between items are represented by identical structural relationships between these items at the level of [[D-structure]]. | ||
| − | + | == Example == | |
| − | |||
Assuming that ''Mary'' in (ia) is in the same thematic relationship with ''give'' as in (ib), Baker proposes that the D-structure of (ia) is identical to that of (ib) and that the S-structure of (ia) is derived as in (ii) (by invisibly incorporating ''to'' in the verb and moving ''Mary'' to the left of ''a book''). | Assuming that ''Mary'' in (ia) is in the same thematic relationship with ''give'' as in (ib), Baker proposes that the D-structure of (ia) is identical to that of (ib) and that the S-structure of (ia) is derived as in (ii) (by invisibly incorporating ''to'' in the verb and moving ''Mary'' to the left of ''a book''). | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
b. John put a saddle on the horse | b. John put a saddle on the horse | ||
| − | + | == Links == | |
| − | + | *[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=UTAH&lemmacode=1682 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | |
| − | [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=UTAH&lemmacode=1682 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | == References == | ||
*Baker, Mark C. 1988. ''Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing.'' Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press. | *Baker, Mark C. 1988. ''Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing.'' Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press. | ||
* Baker, Mark C. 1997. ''Thematic roles and syntactic structure.,'' Haegeman, L. (ed.), Elements of Grammar., 73-137, Kluwer Academic Publishers | * Baker, Mark C. 1997. ''Thematic roles and syntactic structure.,'' Haegeman, L. (ed.), Elements of Grammar., 73-137, Kluwer Academic Publishers | ||
| Line 27: | Line 25: | ||
[[Category:Syntax]] | [[Category:Syntax]] | ||
| − | {{cats | + | {{cats}} |
Latest revision as of 16:30, 24 August 2014
Definition
The Uniformity of Theta-Assignment Hypothesis (UTAH), proposed in Baker (1988), states that identical thematic relationships between items are represented by identical structural relationships between these items at the level of D-structure.
Example
Assuming that Mary in (ia) is in the same thematic relationship with give as in (ib), Baker proposes that the D-structure of (ia) is identical to that of (ib) and that the S-structure of (ia) is derived as in (ii) (by invisibly incorporating to in the verb and moving Mary to the left of a book).
(i) a. John gave Mary a book b. John gave a book to Mary (ii) John gave+toi Maryj a book ti tj
The UTAH has given rise to analyses in cases where the assumption of a D-structural identity is far from obvious, e.g. the pair in (iii). Cf. Hale and Keyser (2002).
(iii) a. John saddled the horse b. John put a saddle on the horse
Links
References
- Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
- Baker, Mark C. 1997. Thematic roles and syntactic structure., Haegeman, L. (ed.), Elements of Grammar., 73-137, Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Hale, K. and S.J. Keyser 2002. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
| CAT | This article needs proper categorization. You can help Glottopedia by categorizing it Please do not remove this block until the problem is fixed. |
