Difference between revisions of "That-trace effect"

From Glottopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (utrecht)
 
(Edited the format and removed the block {{format}})
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Definition==
 
'''That-trace effect''' is the phenomenon that the [[complementizer]] (''that'') cannot be followed by a [[trace]] (except in relative clauses) in some languages (e.g. [[English]]). Thus, in languages showing the ''that''-t(race) effect, a [[subject]] cannot be extracted when it follows ''that''. This is shown by the contrast in (i) and (ii).
 
'''That-trace effect''' is the phenomenon that the [[complementizer]] (''that'') cannot be followed by a [[trace]] (except in relative clauses) in some languages (e.g. [[English]]). Thus, in languages showing the ''that''-t(race) effect, a [[subject]] cannot be extracted when it follows ''that''. This is shown by the contrast in (i) and (ii).
  
Line 8: Line 9:
 
  (iii) wie denk je [<sub>CP</sub> t' [<sub>C'</sub> dat [<sub>IP</sub> t gewonnen heeft ]]]
 
  (iii) wie denk je [<sub>CP</sub> t' [<sub>C'</sub> dat [<sub>IP</sub> t gewonnen heeft ]]]
  
=== Links ===
+
== Links ==
 
+
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=That-trace+effect&lemmacode=148 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=That-trace+effect&lemmacode=148 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
 
 
 
=== References ===
 
  
 +
== References ==
 
* Chomsky, N. 1986b. ''Barriers,'' MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
 
* Chomsky, N. 1986b. ''Barriers,'' MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
 
* Chomsky, N. 1981. ''Lectures on Government and Binding,'' Foris, Dordrecht.
 
* Chomsky, N. 1981. ''Lectures on Government and Binding,'' Foris, Dordrecht.
Line 26: Line 25:
  
  
{{stub}}{{cats}}{{format}}
+
{{stub}}{{cats}}

Latest revision as of 08:54, 17 August 2014

Definition

That-trace effect is the phenomenon that the complementizer (that) cannot be followed by a trace (except in relative clauses) in some languages (e.g. English). Thus, in languages showing the that-t(race) effect, a subject cannot be extracted when it follows that. This is shown by the contrast in (i) and (ii).

(i)     who did you think [CP t' [C' e [IP t would win ]]]
(ii)   *who did you think [CP t' [C' that [IP t would win ]]]

As noted, the that-t effect is not a universal phenomenon. It is absent in e.g. Dutch, as shown by the fact that the Dutch translation of (ii) is grammatical:

(iii)	wie denk je [CP t' [C' dat [IP t gewonnen heeft ]]]

Links

References

  • Chomsky, N. 1986b. Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  • Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.
  • Chomsky, N. & H. Lasnik 1977. Filters and Control, Linguistic Inquiry 8-3, 425-504
  • Kayne, R. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching, Foris, Dordrecht
  • Perlmutter, D. 1971. Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax, Holt, Rinehart and Winston:New York.
  • Pesetsky, D. 1982. Paths and categories, diss. MIT.
  • Taraldsen, T. 1978. On the Nominative Island Condition, vacuous application and the that-trace filter, distributed by IULC.


STUB
CAT This article needs proper categorization. You can help Glottopedia by categorizing it
Please do not remove this block until the problem is fixed.