Difference between revisions of "Resumptive pronoun"

From Glottopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (+utrecht)
(Edited the format, removed the block {{cats}})
 
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''resumptive pronoun''' is a pronoun that refers back to a previously realized item within the same syntactic structure.
+
==Definition==
 
+
A '''resumptive pronoun''' is a pronoun that refers back to a previously realized item within the same syntactic structure. Resumptive pronouns are often found in [[relative clause]]s, where they are realized twice -- once as relative pronoun and once as resumptive pronoun. <br>
Resumptive pronouns are often found in [[relative clause]]s, where they are realized twice -- once as relative pronoun and once as resumptive pronoun.
 
 
 
 
In [[generative syntax]], resumptive pronouns are seen as an alternative strategy to movement (Haegeman  1994: 409), they are spell-out forms, where otherwise (i.e. if movement would have applied properly) only invisible [[trace]]s would be left.
 
In [[generative syntax]], resumptive pronouns are seen as an alternative strategy to movement (Haegeman  1994: 409), they are spell-out forms, where otherwise (i.e. if movement would have applied properly) only invisible [[trace]]s would be left.
 
  
 
'''Resumptive pronoun''' is a pronoun which appears in the position of the [[variable]] bound by a ''wh''-phrase.
 
'''Resumptive pronoun''' is a pronoun which appears in the position of the [[variable]] bound by a ''wh''-phrase.
  
===Examples===
+
==Examples==
 
 
 
The strategy to form relative clauses with resumptive pronouns is applied in non-standard [[French]]:  
 
The strategy to form relative clauses with resumptive pronouns is applied in non-standard [[French]]:  
  
Line 34: Line 30:
 
The resulting [[chain]] presumably violates [[subjacency]]. In (i), on the other hand, ''who'' has not been moved. But being an operator, it must bind a variable, in this case the resumptive pronoun ''him''.
 
The resulting [[chain]] presumably violates [[subjacency]]. In (i), on the other hand, ''who'' has not been moved. But being an operator, it must bind a variable, in this case the resumptive pronoun ''him''.
  
 +
== Links ==
 +
*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Resumptive+pronoun&lemmacode=344 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  
=== Links ===
+
== References ==
 
 
[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Resumptive+pronoun&lemmacode=344 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
 
 
 
=== References ===
 
 
 
 
* Chomsky, N. 1982. ''Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding,'' MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
 
* Chomsky, N. 1982. ''Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding,'' MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
 
* Chomsky, N. 1981. ''Lectures on Government and Binding,'' Foris, Dordrecht.
 
* Chomsky, N. 1981. ''Lectures on Government and Binding,'' Foris, Dordrecht.
Line 48: Line 41:
 
{{dc}}
 
{{dc}}
 
[[Category:Syntax]]
 
[[Category:Syntax]]
{{cats}}
 

Latest revision as of 16:56, 28 September 2014

Definition

A resumptive pronoun is a pronoun that refers back to a previously realized item within the same syntactic structure. Resumptive pronouns are often found in relative clauses, where they are realized twice -- once as relative pronoun and once as resumptive pronoun.
In generative syntax, resumptive pronouns are seen as an alternative strategy to movement (Haegeman 1994: 409), they are spell-out forms, where otherwise (i.e. if movement would have applied properly) only invisible traces would be left.

Resumptive pronoun is a pronoun which appears in the position of the variable bound by a wh-phrase.

Examples

The strategy to form relative clauses with resumptive pronouns is applied in non-standard French:

Voici l'homme que Marie lui a parlé
here_is the_man that Marie to_him has talked

'Here is the man that Marie has talked to' (cited after Haegeman 1994: 409)


in (i) him is a resumptive pronoun bound by who and interpreted as a bound variable.

(i) I wonder [whoi they think [that [if Mary marries himi ] then
    everybody will be happy]]

The appearance of resumptive pronouns is marginal in standard English, but quite acceptable in French and colloquial English. Theoretically, the construction is exceptional as well. Since the if-clause creates an Adjunct Island, extraction of who out of the object position of marries is ungrammatical, as shown in (ii):

(ii) * I wonder [whoi they think [that [if Mary marries ei ] then
       everybody will be happy]]

The resulting chain presumably violates subjacency. In (i), on the other hand, who has not been moved. But being an operator, it must bind a variable, in this case the resumptive pronoun him.

Links

References

  • Chomsky, N. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  • Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.
  • Haegeman, Liliane. 1994. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. 2nd Edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Zribi-Hertz, A. 1984. Orphan prepositions in French and the concept of null pronoun, Researchers Linguistique 12,