Difference between revisions of "Quantifier Raising"

From Glottopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (sic)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
The [[scope ambiguity]] in (ia) follows if QR can derive as LF either (ib) or (ic); (iia) on the other hand is not ambiguous since (iic) can not be derived without violating the [[Complex NP Constraint]]. Other advantages of QR are in the description of [[Weak Crossover]] and Antecedent Contained Deletion. The exact conditions that govern the application of QR, however, remain unclear.
 
The [[scope ambiguity]] in (ia) follows if QR can derive as LF either (ib) or (ic); (iia) on the other hand is not ambiguous since (iic) can not be derived without violating the [[Complex NP Constraint]]. Other advantages of QR are in the description of [[Weak Crossover]] and Antecedent Contained Deletion. The exact conditions that govern the application of QR, however, remain unclear.
 
  
 
=== Morphology ===
 
=== Morphology ===
 
 
Pesetsky (1985) extends the use of QR to morphological structures, and argues that QR can be used to solve the problem of the so-called [[bracketing paradox]]es.
 
Pesetsky (1985) extends the use of QR to morphological structures, and argues that QR can be used to solve the problem of the so-called [[bracketing paradox]]es.
  
 
=== Links ===
 
=== Links ===
 
 
[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Quantifier+Raising&lemmacode=367 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
 
[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Quantifier+Raising&lemmacode=367 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  
 
=== References ===
 
=== References ===
 
 
* Hoeksema, J. 1987. ''Relating Word Structure and Logical Form,'' [[Linguistic Inquiry]] 18, pp. 119-126
 
* Hoeksema, J. 1987. ''Relating Word Structure and Logical Form,'' [[Linguistic Inquiry]] 18, pp. 119-126
 
* Huang, James 1982. ''Move wh in a language without wh-movement,'' [[Linguistic review]], 369-416
 
* Huang, James 1982. ''Move wh in a language without wh-movement,'' [[Linguistic review]], 369-416
Line 31: Line 27:
  
 
{{dc}}
 
{{dc}}
 +
[[Category:En]]
 
[[Category:Syntax]]
 
[[Category:Syntax]]

Revision as of 17:17, 1 June 2014

STUB
CAT This article needs proper categorization. You can help Glottopedia by categorizing it
Please do not remove this block until the problem is fixed.

Quantifier Raising (brief: QR) is a instance of move alpha creating an operator-variable configuration at LF from which the scope of the operator can be calculated. One empirical advantage of assuming a rule of QR which mediates the determination of relative scope is that it explains the sensitivity of quantifier scope to syntactic boundedness effects. Thus consider (i) and (ii).

(i)   a   someonei loves everyonej
      b   [ someonei [ everyonej [ ti loves tj ]]]
      c   [ everyonej [ someonei [ ti loves tj ]]]
 (ii)  a   I know a girl that every boy loves
       b   [[ a girl [ that every boyj [ tj loves ]]]i [ I know ti ]]
      c  *[ every boyj [[ a girl [ that tj loves ]]i [ I know ti ]]]

The scope ambiguity in (ia) follows if QR can derive as LF either (ib) or (ic); (iia) on the other hand is not ambiguous since (iic) can not be derived without violating the Complex NP Constraint. Other advantages of QR are in the description of Weak Crossover and Antecedent Contained Deletion. The exact conditions that govern the application of QR, however, remain unclear.

Morphology

Pesetsky (1985) extends the use of QR to morphological structures, and argues that QR can be used to solve the problem of the so-called bracketing paradoxes.

Links

Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics

References

  • Hoeksema, J. 1987. Relating Word Structure and Logical Form, Linguistic Inquiry 18, pp. 119-126
  • Huang, James 1982. Move wh in a language without wh-movement, Linguistic review, 369-416
  • May, R.C. 1977. The Grammar of Quantification, unp. PhD diss., MIT.
  • May, Robert 1985. Logical form, MIT Press
  • Pesetsky, D. 1985. Morphology and Logical Form, Linguistic Inquiry 16, pp. 193-246
  • Spencer, A. 1991. Morphological Theory, Blackwell, Oxford.