Difference between revisions of "Mapping Principle (in morphology)"

From Glottopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Removed the block {{format}})
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{cats}}{{format}}
 
 
==Definition==
 
==Definition==
 
In morphology, the '''Mapping Principle''' is a principle proposed by Sproat (1985) to relate the phono-morphological and the syntactico-semantic level of representation of complex words to each other. He basically proposes the Mapping Principle to account for the so-called [[bracketing paradox]]es.   
 
In morphology, the '''Mapping Principle''' is a principle proposed by Sproat (1985) to relate the phono-morphological and the syntactico-semantic level of representation of complex words to each other. He basically proposes the Mapping Principle to account for the so-called [[bracketing paradox]]es.   
Line 24: Line 23:
 
*Sproat 1985
 
*Sproat 1985
  
 +
{{cd}}
 
[[Category:En]]
 
[[Category:En]]
 
[[Category:Morphology]]
 
[[Category:Morphology]]
 
{{ref}}
 
{{ref}}

Latest revision as of 18:04, 21 September 2014

Definition

In morphology, the Mapping Principle is a principle proposed by Sproat (1985) to relate the phono-morphological and the syntactico-semantic level of representation of complex words to each other. He basically proposes the Mapping Principle to account for the so-called bracketing paradoxes.

Example

A standard example of a bracketing paradox is ungrammaticality. The phono-morphological representation of this form will include the information that un- is an unstressed prefix, and that -ity is a suffix which attracts stress to the previous syllable. The syntactico-semantic representation will include the information that un- selects adjectives and means 'NOT', and that -ity creates abstract nouns from adjectives. Furthermore, at the phono-morphological level hierarchical structure plays a relatively small role. Instead, strict adjacency tends to be much more relevant. On the other hand, at the syntactico-semantic level, linear order seems to be of little importance. Here, hierarchical structure or sisterhood between morphemes is crucial. At the syntactico-semantic level the representations of ungrammaticality in (i) are equivalent, since linear order is irrelevant. At the phono-morphological level the representations of ungrammaticality in (ii) are also equivalent, since hierarchical structure is irrelevant at this level of representation:

(i)  [[UN [GRAMMATICAL]A ]A ITY]N <=> [ITY [UN [GRAMMATICAL]A ]A ]N 
<=> [[GRAMMATICAL]A UN]A ITY]N <=> [ITY [[GRAMMATICAL]A UN]A ]N

(ii) [[un [grammatical]] ity] <=> [un [[grammatical] ity]]

Sproat defines his Mapping Principle in such a way that [[un [grammatical]] ity] can be rebracketed as [un [[grammatical] ity]], since morphological principles such as level ordering demand it.

Related term

Link

References

  • Spencer 1991
  • Sproat 1985

Template:Cd

REF This article has no reference(s) or source(s).
Please remove this block only when the problem is solved.