Difference between revisions of "Reanalysis (in generative syntax)"
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) m (moved Reanalysis to Reanalysis (in generative syntax)) |
(Edited the format, removed the block {{cats}}) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | ==Definition== | |
| − | |||
In [[generative syntax]], '''reanalysis''' is a notion invoked in the analysis of [[preposition stranding]] and [[clause union]] phenomena. In the case of a [[pseudo-passive]] like (i)a the [[stranded preposition]] at and the [[verb]] ''laughed'' are sometimes reanalyzed as the complex verb ''laughed at'' as in (i)b. | In [[generative syntax]], '''reanalysis''' is a notion invoked in the analysis of [[preposition stranding]] and [[clause union]] phenomena. In the case of a [[pseudo-passive]] like (i)a the [[stranded preposition]] at and the [[verb]] ''laughed'' are sometimes reanalyzed as the complex verb ''laughed at'' as in (i)b. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
In (ii) ''Giorgio'' would fulfill the external theta-roles of ''vuole'' and ''sapere'' which are merged to one. In (iii) ''i bambini'' fulfills the external theta-role of ''dormire'', but this role would be turned into an internal role of the complex ''fa dormire''. Since these kinds of operations are at odds with the [[theta criterion]] and the [[Projection Principle]], two-dimensional phrase-structures have been proposed, assigning more than one representation simultaneously to one sentence, in order to circumvent these problems. One structure is determined basically by theta-relations corresponding to a non-reanalyzed D-structure, the other represents the reanalyzed [[clause union]] structure. See [[co-analysis]]. | In (ii) ''Giorgio'' would fulfill the external theta-roles of ''vuole'' and ''sapere'' which are merged to one. In (iii) ''i bambini'' fulfills the external theta-role of ''dormire'', but this role would be turned into an internal role of the complex ''fa dormire''. Since these kinds of operations are at odds with the [[theta criterion]] and the [[Projection Principle]], two-dimensional phrase-structures have been proposed, assigning more than one representation simultaneously to one sentence, in order to circumvent these problems. One structure is determined basically by theta-relations corresponding to a non-reanalyzed D-structure, the other represents the reanalyzed [[clause union]] structure. See [[co-analysis]]. | ||
| − | + | ==Synonym== | |
| − | [[Reanalysis (in diachrony)]] | + | *[[Reanalysis (in diachrony)]] |
| − | + | == Links == | |
* [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Reanalysis&lemmacode=315 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | * [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Reanalysis&lemmacode=315 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | ||
* [http://www2.rz.hu-berlin.de/linguistik/institut/syntax/onlinelexikon/R/reanalyse.htm Reanalyse] in Norbert Fries, Online Lexikon Linguistik | * [http://www2.rz.hu-berlin.de/linguistik/institut/syntax/onlinelexikon/R/reanalyse.htm Reanalyse] in Norbert Fries, Online Lexikon Linguistik | ||
| − | + | == References == | |
| − | |||
* Di Sciullo, A. M. and E. Williams 1987. ''On the Definition of Word,'' MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass. | * Di Sciullo, A. M. and E. Williams 1987. ''On the Definition of Word,'' MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass. | ||
* Haegeman, L. & H. v.Riemsdijk 1986. ''Verb Projection Raising,Scope, and the Typology of Rules Affecting Verbs,'' Linguistic Inquiry 17, 417-466, . | * Haegeman, L. & H. v.Riemsdijk 1986. ''Verb Projection Raising,Scope, and the Typology of Rules Affecting Verbs,'' Linguistic Inquiry 17, 417-466, . | ||
| Line 32: | Line 30: | ||
* Zubizaretta, M.-L. 1982. ''On the Relationship of the Lexicon to Syntax,'' Diss, MIT. | * Zubizaretta, M.-L. 1982. ''On the Relationship of the Lexicon to Syntax,'' Diss, MIT. | ||
| − | + | ==Other languages== | |
| − | German [[Reanalyse]] | + | *German [[Reanalyse]] |
{{dc}} | {{dc}} | ||
[[Category:Syntax]] | [[Category:Syntax]] | ||
Latest revision as of 08:27, 28 September 2014
Definition
In generative syntax, reanalysis is a notion invoked in the analysis of preposition stranding and clause union phenomena. In the case of a pseudo-passive like (i)a the stranded preposition at and the verb laughed are sometimes reanalyzed as the complex verb laughed at as in (i)b.
(i) a Johni was laughed [PP at ti ]
b Johni was [V laughed at] ti
Reanalysis eliminates the PP-boundary so that the NP-trace ti in (i)b can be properly governed by laughed. Another kind of reanalysis has been proposed in order to handle operations on thematic relations. In these cases reanalysis may collapse (or merge) two external theta-roles in restructuring constructions containing a modal verb, see (ii), but it may also demote an external theta-role to become an internal one in causative constructions, see (iii), while creating a complex predicate. Both examples are Italian:
(ii) Giorgio vuole sapere per che.
Giorgio wants know why
(iii) Giorgio fa dormire i bambini
Giorgio makes sleep the children
In (ii) Giorgio would fulfill the external theta-roles of vuole and sapere which are merged to one. In (iii) i bambini fulfills the external theta-role of dormire, but this role would be turned into an internal role of the complex fa dormire. Since these kinds of operations are at odds with the theta criterion and the Projection Principle, two-dimensional phrase-structures have been proposed, assigning more than one representation simultaneously to one sentence, in order to circumvent these problems. One structure is determined basically by theta-relations corresponding to a non-reanalyzed D-structure, the other represents the reanalyzed clause union structure. See co-analysis.
Synonym
Links
- Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics
- Reanalyse in Norbert Fries, Online Lexikon Linguistik
References
- Di Sciullo, A. M. and E. Williams 1987. On the Definition of Word, MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass.
- Haegeman, L. & H. v.Riemsdijk 1986. Verb Projection Raising,Scope, and the Typology of Rules Affecting Verbs, Linguistic Inquiry 17, 417-466, .
- Koster, J. 1987. Domains and dynasties: The radical autonomy of syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.
- Lasnik, H. & J. Kupin 1976. A Restrictive Theory of Transformational Grammar, Theoretical Linguistics 4, .
- Manzini, R. 1983a. Restructuring and reanalysis, diss. MIT.
- Zubizaretta, M.-L. 1987. Levels of Representation in the Lexicon and in the Syntax, Foris:Dordrecht.
- Zubizaretta, M.-L. 1982. On the Relationship of the Lexicon to Syntax, Diss, MIT.
Other languages
- German Reanalyse
