Lexicon - Revision history

KPolitt: categorization

2013-05-26T09:02:44Z

categorization

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:02, 26 May 2013
Line 28:		Line 28:
	{{dc}}		{{dc}}
	[[Category:General]]		[[Category:General]]
			[[Category:Morphology]]
	~~{{cats}}~~		[[Category:Word formation]]

Wohlgemuth at 16:25, 8 July 2009

2009-07-08T16:25:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, 8 July 2009
Line 29:		Line 29:
	[[Category:General]]		[[Category:General]]

	{{~~cat~~}}		{{cats}}

Volker gast at 12:05, 3 June 2009

2009-06-03T12:05:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:05, 3 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The '''lexicon''' is the component of ~~the [[grammar]]~~ which ~~is in its bare form~~ a list of [[word]]s or [[lexical entry\|lexical entries]]. It contains information about (a) the [[pronunciation]], (b) the [[meaning]], (c) morphological properties, and (d) syntactic properties of its entries. Furthermore, the lexicon must contain at least the idiosyncratic information about its entries.		The '''lexicon''' is the component of a linguistic system which can be regarded as a list or network of [[word]]s or [[lexical entry\|lexical entries]] (also [[lexical item]]s, [[lexeme]]s). It contains information about (a) the [[pronunciation]], (b) the [[meaning]], (c) morphological properties, and (d) syntactic properties of its entries. Furthermore, the lexicon must contain at least the idiosyncratic information about its entries.

			The term 'lexicon' ambiguous insofar as it is used both for a 'mental lexicon' as the representation of lexical knowledge in a speaker's mind, and as an extensional (e.g. printed, electronic) list of lexical items from a given language.

	===Term properties===		===Term properties===
Line 8:		Line 10:

	=== Example ===		=== Example ===

	The English lexicon contains the adjective ''opaque'' and the nominalizing suffix -''ity''. It furthermore contains a suffixation rule which adds -''ity''<nowiki> to adjectives, and by means of this rule the form [[opaque] ity] is derived. This form is changed into </nowiki>''opacity'' in the separate phonological component. In a third approach, known as the theory of [[Lexical Morphology]]<nowiki>/Phonology (e.g. Kiparsky (1982)), the Lexicon contains (a) a list of underived lexical items, (b) linearly ordered levels of word formation rules, and (c) a list of level ordered phonological rules. The difference between this approach and the preceding one is the position of the (lexical) phonological rules. In the theory of Lexical Morphology/Phonology the derived form [[opaque] ity] is changed into </nowiki>''opacity'' within the Lexicon. These three approaches to the Lexicon are the most prominent ones. Spencer (1991) provides a good review of the function assigned to the Lexicon in a great number of theories. See [[permanent lexicon]] and [[potential lexicon]].		The English lexicon contains the adjective ''opaque'' and the nominalizing suffix -''ity''. It furthermore contains a suffixation rule which adds -''ity''<nowiki> to adjectives, and by means of this rule the form [[opaque] ity] is derived. This form is changed into </nowiki>''opacity'' in the separate phonological component. In a third approach, known as the theory of [[Lexical Morphology]]<nowiki>/Phonology (e.g. Kiparsky (1982)), the Lexicon contains (a) a list of underived lexical items, (b) linearly ordered levels of word formation rules, and (c) a list of level ordered phonological rules. The difference between this approach and the preceding one is the position of the (lexical) phonological rules. In the theory of Lexical Morphology/Phonology the derived form [[opaque] ity] is changed into </nowiki>''opacity'' within the Lexicon. These three approaches to the Lexicon are the most prominent ones. Spencer (1991) provides a good review of the function assigned to the Lexicon in a great number of theories. See [[permanent lexicon]] and [[potential lexicon]].

	=== Link ===		=== Link ===

	[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Lexicon&lemmacode=616 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]		[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Lexicon&lemmacode=616 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]

	=== References ===		=== References ===

	* Aronoff, M. 1976. ''Word Formation in Generative Grammar,'' MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass.		* Aronoff, M. 1976. ''Word Formation in Generative Grammar,'' MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass.
	* Bloomfield 1933. ''Language,'' Holt, New York.		* Bloomfield 1933. ''Language,'' Holt, New York.

Haspelmath: various

2009-02-17T10:09:24Z

various

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:09, 17 February 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''~~Lexicon~~''' is ~~The~~ component in the grammar which is in its bare form a list of ~~words~~ or lexical entries. It contains information about (a) the pronunciation, (b) the meaning, (c) morphological properties, and (d) syntactic properties of its entries. Furthermore, the ~~Lexicon~~ must contain at least the idiosyncratic information about its entries. ~~Up to this point there~~ is ~~little or no controversy among linguists. However, beyond this matters become more complex~~. American structuralists (e.g. Bloomfield (1933)) assume that the ~~Lexicon~~ contains only information that is completely idiosyncratic. Any property of a word which can be predicted by phonological, morphological, or syntactic rule will therefore be excluded from the ~~Lexicon~~. In this approach the ~~Lexicon~~ is simply a list of ~~morphemes~~. In other approaches (e.g. Halle (1973), Jackendoff (1975), Aronoff (1976) the ~~Lexicon~~ is more complex. Next to a list of underived lexical entries, it contains a word formation component. Hence, in this approach morphology is an integrated part of the ~~Lexicon~~.		The '''lexicon''' is the component of the [[grammar]] which is in its bare form a list of [[word]]s or [[lexical entry\|lexical entries]]. It contains information about (a) the [[pronunciation]], (b) the [[meaning]], (c) morphological properties, and (d) syntactic properties of its entries. Furthermore, the lexicon must contain at least the idiosyncratic information about its entries.

			===Term properties===
			The relational adjective is ''lexical''.

			===Comments===
			American structuralists (e.g. Bloomfield 1933)) assume that the lexicon contains only information that is completely idiosyncratic. Any property of a word which can be predicted by phonological, morphological, or syntactic rule will therefore be excluded from the lexicon. In this approach the lexicon is simply a list of [[morpheme]]s. In other approaches (e.g. Halle (1973), Jackendoff (1975), Aronoff (1976) the lexicon is more complex. Next to a list of underived lexical entries, it contains a [[word formation]] component. Hence, in this approach morphology is an integrated part of the lexicon.

	=== Example ===		=== Example ===

	~~the~~ English ~~Lexicon~~ contains the adjective ''opaque'' and the nominalizing suffix -''ity''. It furthermore contains a suffixation rule which adds -''ity''<nowiki> to adjectives, and by means of this rule the form [[opaque] ity] is derived. This form is changed into </nowiki>''opacity'' in the separate phonological component. In a third approach, known as the theory of [[Lexical Morphology]]<nowiki>/Phonology (e.g. Kiparsky (1982)), the Lexicon contains (a) a list of underived lexical items, (b) linearly ordered levels of word formation rules, and (c) a list of level ordered phonological rules. The difference between this approach and the preceding one is the position of the (lexical) phonological rules. In the theory of Lexical Morphology/Phonology the derived form [[opaque] ity] is changed into </nowiki>''opacity'' within the Lexicon. These three approaches to the Lexicon are the most prominent ones. Spencer (1991) provides a good review of the function assigned to the Lexicon in a great number of theories. See [[permanent lexicon]] and [[potential lexicon]].		The English lexicon contains the adjective ''opaque'' and the nominalizing suffix -''ity''. It furthermore contains a suffixation rule which adds -''ity''<nowiki> to adjectives, and by means of this rule the form [[opaque] ity] is derived. This form is changed into </nowiki>''opacity'' in the separate phonological component. In a third approach, known as the theory of [[Lexical Morphology]]<nowiki>/Phonology (e.g. Kiparsky (1982)), the Lexicon contains (a) a list of underived lexical items, (b) linearly ordered levels of word formation rules, and (c) a list of level ordered phonological rules. The difference between this approach and the preceding one is the position of the (lexical) phonological rules. In the theory of Lexical Morphology/Phonology the derived form [[opaque] ity] is changed into </nowiki>''opacity'' within the Lexicon. These three approaches to the Lexicon are the most prominent ones. Spencer (1991) provides a good review of the function assigned to the Lexicon in a great number of theories. See [[permanent lexicon]] and [[potential lexicon]].

	=== Link ===		=== Link ===
Line 17:		Line 23:
	* Kiparsky, P. 1982. ''From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological Representations (I), pp.131-175		* Kiparsky, P. 1982. ''From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological Representations (I), pp.131-175
	* Spencer, A. 1991. ''Morphological Theory,'' Blackwell, Oxford.		* Spencer, A. 1991. ''Morphological Theory,'' Blackwell, Oxford.

			===Other languages===
			German [[Lexikon]]

	{{dc}}		{{dc}}

Wohlgemuth: utrecht

2009-02-16T20:53:36Z

utrecht

New page

'''Lexicon''' is The component in the grammar which is in its bare form a list of words or lexical entries. It contains information about (a) the pronunciation, (b) the meaning, (c) morphological properties, and (d) syntactic properties of its entries. Furthermore, the Lexicon must contain at least the idiosyncratic information about its entries. Up to this point there is little or no controversy among linguists. However, beyond this matters become more complex. American structuralists (e.g. Bloomfield (1933)) assume that the Lexicon contains only information that is completely idiosyncratic. Any property of a word which can be predicted by phonological, morphological, or syntactic rule will therefore be excluded from the Lexicon. In this approach the Lexicon is simply a list of morphemes. In other approaches (e.g. Halle (1973), Jackendoff (1975), Aronoff (1976) the Lexicon is more complex. Next to a list of underived lexical entries, it contains a word formation component. Hence, in this approach morphology is an integrated part of the Lexicon.

=== Example ===

the English Lexicon contains the adjective ''opaque'' and the nominalizing suffix -''ity''. It furthermore contains a suffixation rule which adds -''ity''<nowiki> to adjectives, and by means of this rule the form [[opaque] ity] is derived. This form is changed into </nowiki>''opacity'' in the separate phonological component. In a third approach, known as the theory of [[Lexical Morphology]]<nowiki>/Phonology (e.g. Kiparsky (1982)), the Lexicon contains (a) a list of underived lexical items, (b) linearly ordered levels of word formation rules, and (c) a list of level ordered phonological rules. The difference between this approach and the preceding one is the position of the (lexical) phonological rules. In the theory of Lexical Morphology/Phonology the derived form [[opaque] ity] is changed into </nowiki>''opacity'' within the Lexicon. These three approaches to the Lexicon are the most prominent ones. Spencer (1991) provides a good review of the function assigned to the Lexicon in a great number of theories. See [[permanent lexicon]] and [[potential lexicon]].

=== Link ===

[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Lexicon&lemmacode=616 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]

=== References ===

* Aronoff, M. 1976. ''Word Formation in Generative Grammar,'' MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass.
* Bloomfield 1933. ''Language,'' Holt, New York.
* Halle, M. 1973. ''Prolegomena to a Theory of Word-Formation,'' Linguistic Inquiry 4, pp. 451-464
* Jackendoff, R. 1975. ''Morphological and Semantic Regularities in the Lexicon,'' Language 51, pp. 639-671
* Kiparsky, P. 1982. ''From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Phonological Representations (I), pp.131-175
* Spencer, A. 1991. ''Morphological Theory,'' Blackwell, Oxford.

{{dc}}
[[Category:General]]

{{cat}}