Concatenation (in neurocognitive linguistics) - Revision history

PaulSank: /* Types of Concatenation */

2016-12-26T21:31:38Z

Types of Concatenation

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:31, 26 December 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	# '''C-fallible''': A third possibility is that the concatenation may fail as a result of a condition on the C-line, but the B-line will always succeed. These are considerably rarer, but occasionally occur.		# '''C-fallible''': A third possibility is that the concatenation may fail as a result of a condition on the C-line, but the B-line will always succeed. These are considerably rarer, but occasionally occur.
	# '''B-or-C-fallible''': A fourth possibility is that both conditions on the B-line and conditions on the C-line can independently cause the failure of the concatenation element. Reich had never come across an instance of this.		# '''B-or-C-fallible''': A fourth possibility is that both conditions on the B-line and conditions on the C-line can independently cause the failure of the concatenation element. Reich had never come across an instance of this.
	Reich's notation for these types resembles that of a resistor in an electronic schematic~~, where a~~ short segment of the fallible line is made zig-zag.		Reich's notation for these types resembles that of a resistor in an electronic schematic: A short segment of the fallible line is made zig-zag.

	==Sources==		==Sources==

PaulSank: /* Types of Concatenation */

2016-12-26T21:22:41Z

Types of Concatenation

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:22, 26 December 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:

	==Types of Concatenation==		==Types of Concatenation==
	A differentiation of concatenation into four separate cases was found by Reich (1968) to be useful in defining the performance characteristics of relational elements. The differentiation into four cases is based on the conditions under which the concatenation element can fail. ~~PIcture~~ an AND node with incoming line A above it, and two outgoing lines, B and C, below it.		A differentiation of concatenation into four separate cases was found by Reich (1968) to be useful in defining the performance characteristics of relational elements. The differentiation into four cases is based on the conditions under which the concatenation element can fail. Imagine an AND node with an incoming line A above it, and two outgoing lines, B and C, below it.
	# '''Infallible''': The first possibility is simply that if incoming A is to be realized, the concatenation will never fail. This possibility is common in linguistic structure.		# '''Infallible''': The first possibility is simply that if incoming A is to be realized, the concatenation will never fail. This possibility is common in linguistic structure.
	# '''B-fallible''': The second type is where the outgoing B-~~wire~~ may succeed or fail, but the C-~~wire~~ will always succeed.		# '''B-fallible''': The second type is where the outgoing B-line may succeed or fail, but the C-line will always succeed.
	# '''C-fallible''': A third possibility is that the concatenation may fail as a result of a condition on the C-~~wire~~, but the B-~~wire~~ will always succeed. These are considerably rarer, but occasionally occur.		# '''C-fallible''': A third possibility is that the concatenation may fail as a result of a condition on the C-line, but the B-line will always succeed. These are considerably rarer, but occasionally occur.
	# '''B-or-C-fallible''': A fourth possibility is that both conditions on the B-~~wire~~ and conditions on the C-~~wire~~ can independently cause the failure of the concatenation element. Reich had never come across ~~and~~ instance of this.		# '''B-or-C-fallible''': A fourth possibility is that both conditions on the B-line and conditions on the C-line can independently cause the failure of the concatenation element. Reich had never come across an instance of this.
	Reich's notation for these types resembles that of a resistor in an electronic schematic, where a short segment of the fallible line is made zig-zag.		Reich's notation for these types resembles that of a resistor in an electronic schematic, where a short segment of the fallible line is made zig-zag.

PaulSank at 21:21, 26 December 2016

2016-12-26T21:21:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 26 December 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	# '''C-fallible''': A third possibility is that the concatenation may fail as a result of a condition on the C-wire, but the B-wire will always succeed. These are considerably rarer, but occasionally occur.		# '''C-fallible''': A third possibility is that the concatenation may fail as a result of a condition on the C-wire, but the B-wire will always succeed. These are considerably rarer, but occasionally occur.
	# '''B-or-C-fallible''': A fourth possibility is that both conditions on the B-wire and conditions on the C-wire can independently cause the failure of the concatenation element. Reich had never come across and instance of this.		# '''B-or-C-fallible''': A fourth possibility is that both conditions on the B-wire and conditions on the C-wire can independently cause the failure of the concatenation element. Reich had never come across and instance of this.
	~~<br>~~Reich's notation for these types ~~resembled~~ that of a resistor in an electronic schematic, where a short segment of the fallible line is made zig-zag.		Reich's notation for these types resembles that of a resistor in an electronic schematic, where a short segment of the fallible line is made zig-zag.

	==Sources==		==Sources==

PaulSank at 21:02, 26 December 2016

2016-12-26T21:02:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:02, 26 December 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	# '''C-fallible''': A third possibility is that the concatenation may fail as a result of a condition on the C-wire, but the B-wire will always succeed. These are considerably rarer, but occasionally occur.		# '''C-fallible''': A third possibility is that the concatenation may fail as a result of a condition on the C-wire, but the B-wire will always succeed. These are considerably rarer, but occasionally occur.
	# '''B-or-C-fallible''': A fourth possibility is that both conditions on the B-wire and conditions on the C-wire can independently cause the failure of the concatenation element. Reich had never come across and instance of this.		# '''B-or-C-fallible''': A fourth possibility is that both conditions on the B-wire and conditions on the C-wire can independently cause the failure of the concatenation element. Reich had never come across and instance of this.
			<br>Reich's notation for these types resembled that of a resistor in an electronic schematic, where a short segment of the fallible line is made zig-zag.

	==Sources==		==Sources==

PaulSank: added content

2016-12-26T21:00:13Z

added content

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:00, 26 December 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:

	==Types of Concatenation==		==Types of Concatenation==
	A differentiation of concatenation into four separate cases was found by Reich () to be useful in defining the performance characteristics of relational elements. The differentiation into four cases is based on the conditions under which the concatenation element can fail.		A differentiation of concatenation into four separate cases was found by Reich (1968) to be useful in defining the performance characteristics of relational elements. The differentiation into four cases is based on the conditions under which the concatenation element can fail. PIcture an AND node with incoming line A above it, and two outgoing lines, B and C, below it.
			# '''Infallible''': The first possibility is simply that if incoming A is to be realized, the concatenation will never fail. This possibility is common in linguistic structure.
			# '''B-fallible''': The second type is where the outgoing B-wire may succeed or fail, but the C-wire will always succeed.
			# '''C-fallible''': A third possibility is that the concatenation may fail as a result of a condition on the C-wire, but the B-wire will always succeed. These are considerably rarer, but occasionally occur.
			# '''B-or-C-fallible''': A fourth possibility is that both conditions on the B-wire and conditions on the C-wire can independently cause the failure of the concatenation element. Reich had never come across and instance of this.

			==Sources==
			*Reich, Peter A. [http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED025752.pdf The English Auxiliaries: A relational network description]. New Haven: Yale Linguistic Automation Project, 1968.

	[[Category:En]][[Category:DICT]][[Category:Grammar]]		[[Category:En]][[Category:DICT]][[Category:Grammar]]

PaulSank at 19:36, 26 December 2016

2016-12-26T19:36:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:36, 26 December 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:

	==Types of Concatenation==		==Types of Concatenation==
	A differentiation of concatenation into four separate cases was found by Reich () to be useful in defining the performance characteristics of relational elements. The differentiation into four cases is based on the conditions under ~~with~~ the concatenation element can fail.		A differentiation of concatenation into four separate cases was found by Reich () to be useful in defining the performance characteristics of relational elements. The differentiation into four cases is based on the conditions under which the concatenation element can fail.

	[[Category:En]][[Category:DICT]][[Category:Grammar]]		[[Category:En]][[Category:DICT]][[Category:Grammar]]

PaulSank at 21:34, 20 December 2016

2016-12-20T21:34:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:34, 20 December 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Concatenation''' (in neurocognitive linguistics) is when one [[Line (in relational network theory)\|line]] is activated after another line below an ordered [[AND node]].		'''Concatenation''' (in neurocognitive linguistics) is when one [[Line (in relational network theory)\|line]] is activated after another line, in sequence, below an ordered [[AND node]].

	==Types of Concatenation==		==Types of Concatenation==

PaulSank at 21:28, 20 December 2016

2016-12-20T21:28:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:28, 20 December 2016
Line 4:		Line 4:
	A differentiation of concatenation into four separate cases was found by Reich () to be useful in defining the performance characteristics of relational elements. The differentiation into four cases is based on the conditions under with the concatenation element can fail.		A differentiation of concatenation into four separate cases was found by Reich () to be useful in defining the performance characteristics of relational elements. The differentiation into four cases is based on the conditions under with the concatenation element can fail.

	[[Category:EN]][[Category:~~Dict~~]][[Category:Grammar]]		[[Category:En]][[Category:DICT]][[Category:Grammar]]

PaulSank: new page begun

2016-12-20T21:27:39Z

new page begun

New page

'''Concatenation''' (in neurocognitive linguistics) is when one [[Line (in relational network theory)|line]] is activated after another line below an ordered [[AND node]].

==Types of Concatenation==
A differentiation of concatenation into four separate cases was found by Reich () to be useful in defining the performance characteristics of relational elements. The differentiation into four cases is based on the conditions under with the concatenation element can fail.

[[Category:EN]][[Category:Dict]][[Category:Grammar]]